Imágenes de páginas
PDF
EPUB
[blocks in formation]

that it shall be revocable, it cannot be revoked; Story, Ag. §§ 476, 477; 2 Kent, 643, 644; 8 Wheat. 174; 10 Paige, 205; 34 N. Y. 24; 53 Penn. 212; 3 Const. 62; 2 Mas C. C. 244, 342. When the authority has been partially executed by the agent, if it admit of severance, or of being revoked as to the part which is unexecuted, it may be revoked as to that part; but if it be not thus severable, and the agent by its execution in part will sustain damage, it cannot be revoked as to the unexecuted part unless the agent be fully indemnified; Story, Ag. § 466. This revocation may be by a formal declaration publicly made known, by an informal writing, or by parol; or it may be implied from circumstances, as, if another person be ap; pointed to do the same act; Story, Ag. ? 474; 5 Binn. 305; 6 Pick. 198. See 11 Allen, 208. It takes effect from the time it is made known, and not before, both as regards the agent and third persons; Story, Ag. § 470; 2 Kent, 644; 11 N. H. 397; 7 Ct. of Cl. 535; 44 Ill. 114; 35 Vt. 179; 95 U. S. 48; 38 Conn. 197.

The determination may be by the renunciation of the agent either before or after a part of the authority is executed; Story, Ag. § 478; it should be observed, however, that if the renunciation be made after the authority has been partly executed, the agent by renouncing it becomes liable for the damages which may thereby be sustained by his principal; Story, Ag. § 478; Jones, Bailm. 101; 4 Johns. 84; or, by operation of law, in various ways. And the agency may terminate by the expiration of the period during which it was to exist and to have effect; as, if an agency be created to endure a year, or until the happening of a contingency, it becomes extinct at the end of the year, or on the happening of the contingency; Story, Ag. § 480. The determination may result from the marriage of the principal, if a feme sole; the insanity of the principal; 10 N. H. 156; 8 Wheat. 174; bankruptcy; Story, Ag. § 482; 16 East, 382; Baldw. C. C. 38; or death; Story, Bailm. § 209; 2 Kent, 645 (in England and most of the United States this revocation is instantaneous, even as to-third parties without notice; L. R. 4 C. P. 744; 84 Ill. 286; 10 M. & W. 1; 5 Pet. 319; 12 N. H. 145; 25 Ind. 182; 2 Humph. 350; 31 Ala. 274; 29 Tex. 204; 28 Cal. 645; 77 Iowa, 73; 9 Wend. 452. But notice is necessary in Pennsylvania, Missouri, and, in some cases, in Ohio; 4 W. & S. 282; 26 Mo. 313; 8 Ohio St. 520; and under the civil law; Whart. Ag. § 101); but not when the authority is coupled with an interest; 53 Penn. 266; 4 Campb. 325; 10 Paige, 201; see 4 Pet. 332; or from the insanity; Story, Ag. § 487; bankruptcy; 5 B. & Ald. 27, 31; or death of the agent; 2 Kent, 643; though not necessarily by marriage or bankruptcy; Story, Ag. §§ 485, 486; 12 Mod. 383; 3 Burr. 1469, 1471; from the extinction of the subject-matter of the agency, or of the principal's power over it,

AGENT

or by the complete execution of the trust; Story, Ag. § 499.

As to revocation by lunacy of principal, see late English case in 19 Am. L. Reg. 106, with Judge Bennett's note. As to revocation by death of principal, see id. 401. AGENS (Lat. agere, to do; to conduct). A conductor or manager of affairs. Distinguished from factor, a workman. A plaintiff. Fleta, lib. 4, c. 15, § 8. AGENT (Lat. agens; from agere, to do). One who undertakes to transact some busiby the authority and on account of the latter, ness, or to manage some affair, for another, and to render an account of it; 1 Livermore, Ag. 67; 2 Bouvier, Inst. 3. See Co. Litt.

207; 1 B. & P. 316.

The term is one of a very wide application, and includes a great many classes of persons to which distinctive appellations are given; as, factors, brokers, attorneys, cashiers of banks, auctioneers, clerks, supercargoes, consignees, ships' husbands, masters of ships, and the like. The terms agent and attorney are often used synonymously. Thus, a letter or power of attorney is constantly spoken of as the formal instrument by which an agency is created; Paley, Ag., Dunl. ed. 1, n.

Who may be.

See 70

Many persons disqualified from acting for themselves, such as infants (117 Mass. 479), persons attainted or outlaws, aliens (19 La. Ann. 482; see 18 Wall. 106; 42 N. Y. 54; 62 Ill. 61), slaves, and others, may yet act as agents in the execution of a naked authority; Whart. Ag. § 14; 45 Ala. 656; 1 Hill (s. c.) 270; Coke, Litt. 252 a; Story, Ag. § 4. Α feme covert may be the agent of her husband, and as such, with his consent, bind him by her contract or other act; 47 Ala. 624; 16 Vt. 633; 3 Head. (Tenn.) 471. Penn. 181; and she may be the agent of another in a contract with her husband; Bacon, Abr. Authority, B; 6 N. H. 124; 3 Whart. 369; 16 Vt. 653. But although she is in general competent to act as the agent of a third person; 7 Bingh. 565; 1 Esp. 142; 2 id. 511; 4 Wend. 465; it is not clear that she can do so when her husband expressly dissents, particularly when he may be rendered liable for her acts; Story, Ag. § 7. Persons non compos mentis cannot be agents for others; Whart. Ag. § 15 (but see Ewell's Evans, Agency, *10; 4 Exch. 7; s. c. Ewell, Lead. Cas. on Disabilities, 614; as to cases when one deals with a lunatic, not knowing of his lunacy. See, also, 55 Ill. 62; 34 Ind. 181; 14 Barb. 488; 23 Iowa, 433; 48 N. H. 133; 6 Gray, 279; 23 Ark. 417; 24 Ind. 238); nor can a person act as agent in a transaction where he has an adverse interest or employment; 2 Ves. Ch. 317; 11 Clark & F. 714; 3 Beav. 783; 2 Campb. 203; 2 Chitty, Bail, 205; 30 Me. 431; 24 Ala. N. s. 358; 3 Denio, 575; 19 Barb. 595; 20 id. 470; 6

AGENT

La. 407; 7 Watts, 472; and whenever the agent holds a fiduciary relation, he cannot contract with the same general binding force with his principal as when such a relation does not exist; Story, Ag. § 9; 1 Story, Eq. Jur. §§ 308, 328; 4 M. & C. 134; 14 Ves. 290; 3 Sumn. 476; 2 Johns. Ch. 251; 11 Paige, 538; 5 Me. 420; 6 Pick. 198; 4 Conn. 717; 10 Pet. 269.

Extent of authority.

The authority of the agent, unless the contrary clearly appears, is presumed to include all the necessary and usual means of executing it with effect; Story, Ag. §§ 58, 85, 86; 5 Bingh. 442; 2 H. Bla. 618; 10 Wend. 218; 6 S. & R. 146; 11 Ill. 177; 9 Metc. 91; 22 Pick. 85; 15 Miss. 365; 9 Leigh, Va. 387; 11 N. H. 424; 6 Ired. 252; 10 Ala. N. s. 386; 21 id. 488; 1 Ga. 418; 1 Sneed, 497; 8 Humphr. 509; 15 Vt. 155; 2 McLean, 543; 8 How. 441. Where, however, the whole authority is conferred by a written instrument, its nature and extent must be ascertained from the instrument itself, and cannot be enlarged by parol evidence; Story, Ag. §§ 76, 79; 1 Taunt. 347; 5 B. & Ald. 204; 7 Rich. 45; 1 Pet. 264; 3 Cranch, 415.

136

Generally, in private agencies, when an authority is given by the principal; 7 N. H. 253; 1 Dougl. Mich. 119; 11 Ala. N. s. 755; 1 B. & P. 229; 3 Term, 592; to two or more persons to do an act, and no several authority is given, all the agents must concur in doing it, in order to bind the principal, though one die or refuse; Story, Ag. § 42; 3 Pick. 232; 6 id. 198; 12 Mass. 185; 23 Wend. 324; 6 Johns. 39; 9 Watts & S. 56; 10 Vt. 532; 12 N. H. 226; 1 Gratt. 226; 53 N. Y. 114; 57 Ill. 180. The words jointly and severally, and jointly or severally, have been construed as authorizing all to act jointly, or each one to act separately, but not as authorizing any portion of the number to do the act jointly; Paley, Ag., Lloyd ed. 177, note. But where the authority is so worded that it is apparent the principal intended to give power to either of them, an execution by a part will be valid; Coke, Litt. 49 b; Dyer, 62; 5 B. & Ald. 628. And generally, in commercial transactions, each one of several agents possesses the whole power. For example, on a consignment of goods for sale to two factors (whether they are partners or not), each of them is understood to possess the whole power over the goods for the purposes of the consignment; Story, Ag. § 44; 3 Wils. 94, 114; 20 Pick. 59; 24 id. 13; see 53 N. Y. 114. In public agencies an authority executed by a majority will be sufficient; 1 Coke, Litt. 181 b; Comyns, Dig. Attorney, c. 15; Bacon, Abr. Authority, C; 1 Term, 592; 10 Wis. 271; 11 Ala. 755. A mere agent cannot, generally, appoint a sub-agent, so as to render the latter directly responsible to the principal; 9 Coke, 75; 2 M. & S. 298, 301; 1 Younge & J. 387; 4 Mass. 597; 12 id. 241; 1 Hill, 501; 13 B. Monr. 400; 12 N. H. 226; 3 Story, 411; 72

AGENT

Penn. 491; 26 Wend. 485; 11 How. 209; 28 Tex. 163; 34 Miss. 63; but may when such is the usage of trade, or is understood by the parties to be the mode in which the particular business might be done; 9 Ves. 234; 1 M. & S. 484; 2 id. 301; 6 S. & R. 386; 1 Ala. N. s. 249; 3 Johns. Ch. 167; 51 N. Y. 117. Duties and liabilities.

The particular obligations of an agent vary according to the nature, terms, and end of his employment; Paley, Ag. 3; 2 Ld. Raym. 517. He is bound to execute the orders of his principal whenever, for a valuable consideration, he has undertaken to perform them; Story, Ag. 2 189; 5 Cowen, 128; 20 Wend. 321. When his authority is limited by instructions, it is his duty to adhere faithfully to those instructions; Paley, Ag. 3, 4; 3 B. & P. 75; 5 id. 269; Story, Ag. § 192; 3 Johns. Cas. 36; 1 Sandf. 111; 26 Penn. 394; 14 Pet. 494; 25 N. J. Eq. 202; 48 Ga. 128; 3 W. Va. 133; 31 Ill. 200; but cases of extreme necessity and unforeseen emergency constitute exceptions to this rule; 1 Story, 45; 4 Binn. 361; 5 Day, 556; 26 Penn. 394; 4 Campb. 83; and where the agent is required to do an illegal or an immoral act; 6 C. Rob. Adm. 207; 7 Term, 157; 11 Wheat. 258; he may violate his instructions with impunity; Story, Ag. §§ 193, 194, 195. If he have no specific instructions, he must follow the accustomed course of the business; Story, Ag. § 199; 1 Gall. C. C. 360; 11 Mart. La. 636. When the transaction may, with equal advantage to the principal, be done in two or more different ways, the agent may in general do it in either, provided a particular mode has not been prescribed to him; 1 Livermore, Ag. 103. He is to exercise the skill employed by persons of common capacity similarly engaged, and the same degree of diligence that persons of ordinary prudence are accustomed to use about their own affairs; 6 Taunt. 495; 10 Bingh. 57; 1 Johns. 364; 20 Pick. 167; 6 Metc. 13; 24 Vt. 149; 57 Mo. 93; 66 Ill. 136; 21 Wall. 178; 38 Miss. 242. It is his duty to keep his principal informed of his doings, and to give him reasonable notice of whatever may be important to his interests; 5 M. & W. 527; 4 Watts & S. 305; 1 Story, 43, 56; 4 Rawle, 229; 6 Whart. 9; 13 Mart. La. 214, 365. He is also bound to keep regular accounts, and to render his accounts to his principal at all reasonable times, without concealment or overcharge; Story, Ag. § 203; 22 Tex. 703; 22 La. An. 599; 9 Iowa, 589; 52 Ill. 512; 4 Mo. Cr. 41.

As to their principals, the liabilities of agents arise from a violation of duties and obligations to them by exceeding his authority, by misconduct, or by any negligence, omission, or act by the natural result or just consequence of which the principal sustains a loss; Paley, Ag. 7, 71, 74; 1 B. & Ad. 415; 6 Hare, 366; 12 Pick. 328; 20 id. 167; 11 Ohio, 363; 13 Wend. 518; 6 Whart. 9. And

[blocks in formation]

joint agents who have a common interest are liable for the misconduct and omissions of each other, in violation of their duty, although the business has, in fact, been wholly transacted by one with the knowledge of the principal, and it has been privately agreed between themselves that neither shall be liable for the acts or losses of the other; Story, Ag. § 232; Paley, Ag. 52, 53; 7 Taunt. 403; 3 Wils. 73; 51 N. Y. 373.

AGENT

[ocr errors]

an

766, 767; 61 Penn. 69. In general, although
a person contract as agent, yet if there be no
other responsible principal to whom resort can
be had, he will be personally liable: as, if a
man sign a note as "guardian of A. B.,'
infant, in that case neither the infant nor his
property will be liable, and the agent alone
will be responsible; Story, Ag. § 280; 2
Brod. & B. 460; 5 Mass. 299; 6 id. 58; 8
Cowen, 31. The case of an agent of govern-
ment, acting in that capacity for the public,
is an exception to this rule, even though the
terms of the contract be such as might, in a
case of a private nature, involve him in a per-
sonal obligation; it not being presumed that
a public agent meant to bind himself in-
dividually; Paley, Ag. 376, 377; and see 5
B. & Ald. 34; 1 Brown, Ch. 101; 6 Dowl.
& R. 122; 7 Bingh. 110. Masters of ships,
though known to contract for the owners of
the ships and not for themselves, are liable
for the contracts they make for repairs, unless
they negative their responsibility by the ex-
press terms of the contract; Paley, Ag. 388;
15 Johns. 298; 16 id. 89; 11 Mass. 34.
a general rule, the agent of a person resident
in a foreign country is personally liable upon
all contracts made by him for his employer,
whether he describe himself in the contract as

As

The degree of neglect which will make the agent responsible for damages varies according to the nature of the business and the relation in which he stands to his principal. The rule of the common law is, that where a person holds himself out as of a certain business, trade, or profession, and undertakes, whether gratuitously or otherwise, to perform an act which relates to his particular employment, an omission of the skill which belongs to his situation or profession is imputable to him as a fraud upon his employer; Paley, Ag., Lloyd ed. 7, note 4. But where his employment does not necessarily imply skill in the business he has undertaken, and he is to have no compensation for what he does, he will not be liable to an action if he act bonâ fide and to the best of his ability; 1 Livermore, Ag. 336, 339, 340. As to third parties, generally, when a per-agent or not, this being the usage of trade, son having full authority is known to act merely for another, his acts and contracts will be deemed those of the principal only, and the agent will incur no personal responsibility; Story, Ag. § 261; Paley, Ag. 368, 369; 2 Kent, 629, 630; 15 East, 62; 3 P. Will. 277; 6 Binn. 324; 13 Johns. 58, 77; 15 id. 1. But when an agent does an act without authority, or exceeds his authority, and the want of authority is unknown to the other party, the agent will be personally responsible to the person with whom he deals; Story, Ag. § 264; 2 Taunt. 385; 7 Wend. 315; 8 Mass. 178. If the agent having original authority contract in the name of his principal, and it happen that at the time of the contract, unknown to both parties, his authority was revoked by the death of the principal, the agent will not be personally responsible; Story, Ag. § 265 a; 10 M. & W. 1.

An agent will be liable on a contract made with him when he expressly, or by implication, incurs a personal responsibility; Story, Ag. §§ 156-159; 269; as, if he make an express warranty of title, and the like; or if, though known to act as agent, he give or accept a draft in his own name; 5 Taunt. 74; 1 Mass. 27, 54; 2 Duer, 260; 2 Conn. 453; 5 Whart. 288; and public as well as private agents may, by a personal engagement, render themselves personally liable; Paley, Ag. 381. If he makes a contract, signs a note, or accepts a draft as agent," without disclosing his principal, he becomes personally liable unless the person with whom he is dealing has knowledge of the character and extent of the agency or the circumstances of the transaction are sufficient to inform him; 1 Am. L. C.

66

and it being presumed that the credit was given to him and not to his principal; Story, Ag. § 268; 15 East, 68; 9 B. & C. 78; L. R. 9 Q. B. 572; 35 Md. 396; 15 East, 62; 22 Wend. 244; 33 Me. 106; 5 W. & S. 9; 3 Hill, N. Y. 72; but this presumption may be rebutted by proof of a contrary agreement; 11 Ad. & E. 589, 594, 595; and does not apply to agents in a different state within the U. S.; 23 Ind. 63.

An agent is personally responsible where money has been paid to him for the use of his principal under such circumstances that the party paying it becomes entitled to recall it. In such cases, as long as the money has not been paid over by the agent, nor his situation altered, as by giving his principal fresh credit upon the faith of it, it may be recovered from the agent; Story, Ag. § 300; 3 M. & S. 344; 7 Johns. 179; 1 Wend. 173; and if, in receiving the money, the agent was a wrong-doer, he will not be exempted from liability by payment to his principal; Paley, Ag. 393, 394; Campb. 396.

With regard to the liability of agents to third persons for torts, there is a distinction between acts of misfeasance or positive wrongs, and non-feasances or mere omissions of duty. In the former case, the agent is personally liable to third persons, although authorized by his principal; Story, Ag. § 311; Paley, Ag. 396; Wils. 328; 1 B. & P. 410; 28 Me. 464; while in the latter he is, in general, solely liable to his principal; Story, Ag. § 308; Paley, Ag. 396, 397, 398; Story, Bailm. §§ 400, 404, 507.

Where the sub-agents are appointed, if the agent has either express or implied authority

AGENT

to appoint a sub-agent, he will not ordinarily
be responsible for the acts or omissions of the
substitute, 2 B. & P. 438; 2 M. & S. 301; 1
Wash. C. C. 479; 8 Cowen, 198 (but only
for negligence in choosing the substitute;
Whart. Negl. § 277); and this is especially
true of public officers; 1 Ld. Raym. 646;
Cowp. 754; 15 East, 384; 7 Cranch, 242; 9
Wheat. 720; 8 Wend. 403; 3 Hill, 531; 22
N. H. 252; 13 Ohio, 523; 1 Pick. 418; 4
Mass. 378; 8 Watts, 455; but the sub-agent
will himself be directly responsible to the
principal for his own negligence or miscon-
duct; Story, Ag. § 201, 217 a; 2 Gall. C.
C. 565; 8 Cow. N. Y. 198.

Rights and privileges.

[blocks in formation]

Pick. 328, 332; 20 id. 167; nor will he be
entitled to be reimbursed his expenses after he
has notice that his authority has been re-
voked; 2 Term, 113; 8 d. 204; 3 Brown,
Ch. 314.

The agent may enforce the payment of a
debt due him from his principal on account of
the agency, either by an action at law or by a
bill in equity, according to the nature of the
case; and he may also have the benefit of his
claim by way of set-off to an action of his
principal against him, provided the claim is
not for uncertain damages, and is in other re-
spects of such a nature as to be the subject of
a set-off; Story, Ag. §§ 350, 385; 4 Burr,
2133; 6 Cowen, 181; 11 Pick. 482. He has
also a lien for all his necessary commissions,
expenditures, advances, and services in and
As to his principal, an agent is ordinarily about the property intrusted to his agency,
entitled to compensation for his services, com- which right is in many respects analogous to
monly called a commission, which is regulated the right of set-off; Story, Ag. § 373; 40 N.
either by special agreement, by the usage of H. 88, 511; 67 Ill. 139; 8 Iowa, 211; 30
trade, or by the presumed intention of the Miss. 578; but it is only a particular lien;
parties; Story, Ag. §§ 324, 326; 8 Bingh. 9 Cush. 215; 8 Engl. (Ark.) 437; 8 H. L.
65; 1 Caines, 349; 2 id. 357. In general, Cas. 838. Factors have a general lien upon
he must have faithfully performed the whole the goods of their principal in their posses-
service or duty before he can claim any com- sion, and upon the price of such as have been
missions; Story, Ag. §§ 329, 331; 1 C. & P. lawfully sold by them, and the securities given
384; 4 id. 289; 7 Bingh. 99; 16 Ohio, 412. therefor; Story, Ag. § 376; 2 Kent, 640; 26
He may forfeit his right to commissions by Wend. 367; 10 Paige, Ch. 205. There are
gross unskilfulness, by gross negligence, or other eases in which a general lien exists in
gross misconduct, in the course of his agency; regard to particular classes of agents, either
3 Campb. 451; 7 Bingh. 569; 12 Pick. 328; from usage, from a special agreement of the
as, by not keeping regular accounts; 8 Ves. parties, or from the peculiar habit of dealing
48; 11 id. 358; 17 Mass. 145; 2 Johns. Ch. | between them: such, for example, as insur-
N. Y. 108; by violating his instructions; by ance brokers, bankers, common carriers, at-
wilfully confounding his own property with torneys-at-law, and solicitors in equity, pack-
that of his principal; 9 Beav. 284; 5 Bos. & ers, calico-printers, fullers, dyers, and wharf-
P. 136; 11 Ohio, 363; by fraudulently mis-ingers; Story, Ag. §§ 379-384. See LIEN.
applying the funds of his principal; 3 Chitty,
Comm. & M. 222; by embarking the prop-
erty in illegal transactions; or by doing any
thing which amounts to a betrayal of his
trust; 12 Pick. 328, 332, 334; 20 Grat. 672;
21 Iowa, 326; L. R. 9 Q. B. 480; 98 Mass.
348; 25 Conn. 386; 52 Ill. 512; 9 Kans.
320; 29 Cal. 142; 71 Penn. 206.

As to third persons, in general, a mere
agent who has no beneficial interest in a con-
tract which he has made on behalf of his prin-
cipal cannot support an action thereon; 1aLiv-
ermore, Ag. 215; 22 Penn. 522. An agent
acquires a right to maintain an action upon a
contract against third persons in the following
cases: First, when the contract is in writing,
The agent has a right to be reimbursed his and made expressly with the agent, and im-
advances, expenses, and disbursements rea- ports to be a contract personally with him; as,
sonably and in good faith incurred and paid, for example, when a promissory note is given
without any default on his part, in the course to the agent, as such, for the benefit of the
of the agency; Story, Ag. §§ 335, 336; 5 B. principal, and the promise is to pay the money
& C. 141; 3 Binn. 295; 11 Johns. 439; 4 to the agent eo nomine; in such case the agent
Halst. Ch. 657; and also to be paid interest is the legal plaintiff, and alone can bring an
on such advancements and disbursements action; Story, Ag. §§ 393, 394, 396; 1 Liv-
whenever it may fairly be presumed to have ermore, Ag. 215–221; 3 Pick. 322; 16 id.
been stipulated for, or to be due to him; 15 381; 5 Vt. 500; Dicey, Parties, 134; 5 Penn.
East, 223; 3 Campb. 467; 7 Wend. 315; 3 520; 27 Penn. 97; and it has been held that
Caines, 226; 3 Binn. 295. But he cannot the right of the agent in such case to sue in
recover for advances and disbursements made his own name is not confined to an express
in the prosecution of an illegal transaction, contract; thus, it has been said that one hold-
though sanctioned by or even undertaken at ing, as mere agent, a bill of exchange, or
the request of his principal; Story, Ag. § 344; promissory note, indorsed in blauk, or a check
3 B. & C. 639; and he may forfeit all remedy or note payable to bearer, may yet sue on it
against his principal even for his advances and in his own name; Paley, Ag., Dunl. ed. 361,
disbursements made in the course of legal note. Second, the agent may maintain an ac-
transactions by his own gross negligence, tion against third persons on contracts made
fraud, or misconduct; 12 Wend. 362; 12 with them, whenever he is the only known

[blocks in formation]

and ostensible principal, and consequently, in contemplation of law, the real contracting party; Russ. Fact. & B. 241, 244; Paley, Ag. 361, note; Story, Ag. § 393; Dicey, Parties, 136-138; 5 Penn. 41; as, if an agent sell goods of his principal in his own name, as though he were the owner, he is entitled to sue the buyer in his own name; 12 Wend. 413; 5 M. & S. 833; and, on the other hand, if he so buy, he may enforce the contract by action. The renunciation of the agent's contract by the principal does not necessarily preclude the agent from maintaining an action, but he will still be entitled to sue the party with whom he has contracted for any damages which he may have sustained by reason of a breach of contract by the latter; Russ. Fact. & B. 243, 244; 2 B. & Ald. 962. Third, the right of the agent to sue in his own name exists when, by the usage of trade or the general course of business, he is authorized to act as owner, or as a principal contracting party, although his character as agent is known; Story, Ag. § 393. Fourth, where the agent has made a contract in the subjectmatter of which he has a special interest or property, he may enforce his contract by action, whether he held himself out at the time to be acting in his own behalf or not; 1 Livermore, Ag. 215-219; Story, Ag. § 393; 27 Ala. N. 8. 215; Dicey, Parties, 189; 22 Penn. 522: for example, an auctioneer who sells the goods of another may maintain an action for the price, though the sale be on the premises of the owner of the goods, because the auctioneer has a possession coupled with an interest; 2 Esp. 493; 1 H. Bla. 81, 84, 85. But this right of the agent to bring an action in his own name is subordinate to the rights of the principal, who may, unless in particular cases where the agent has a lien or some other vested right, bring a suit himself, and suspend or extinguish the right of the agent; 1 Livermore, Ag. 221; Story, Ag. § 403; 3 Hill, 72, 73; 6 S. & R. 27; 4 Campb. 194. An agent may maintain an action of trespass or trover against third persons for injuries affecting the possession of his principal's property; and when he has been induced by the fraud of a third person to sell or buy goods for his principal, and he has sustained a personal loss, he may maintain an action against such third person for such wrongful act, deceit, or fraud; Story, Ag. §§ 414, 415; 9 B. & C. 208; 3 Campb. 320; 1 H. Bla. 81; 1 B. & Ald. 59. But his remedy for mere torts is confined to cases like the foregoing, where his "right of possession is injuriously invaded, or where he incurs a personal responsibility, or loss, or damage in consequence of the tort" Story, Ag. § 416.

AGGRAVATION

ness of the agency, the sub-agent can maintain his claim for compensation both against the principal and the immediate employer, unless the agency be avowed and exclusive credit be given to the principal, in which case his remedy will be limited to the principal; Story, Ag. §§ 386, 387; 6 Taunt. 147; 4 Wend. 285; 16 La. An. 127; 6 S. & R. 386; 3 Johns. 167.

A sub-agent will be clothed with a lien against the principal for services performed and disbursements made by him on account of the sub-agency, whenever a privity exists between them; Story, Ag. § 388; 2 Campb. 218, 597; 2 East, 523; 6 Wend. 475. He will acquire a lien against the principal if the latter ratifies his acts, or seeks to avail himself of the proceeds of the sub-agency, though employed by the agent without the knowledge or consent of the principal; Story, Ag. § 389; 2 Campb. 218, 597, 598; 4 id. 348, 353. He may avail himself of his general lien against the principal by way of substitution to the rights of his immediate employer, to the extent of the lien of the latter; Story, Ag. § 389; 1 East, 335; 2 id. 523, 529; 7 id. 7; 6 Taunt. 147. And there are cases in which a sub-agent who has no knowledge or reason to believe that his immediate employer is acting as an agent for another, will have a lien on the property for his general balance; 2 Livermore, Ag. 87-92; Paley, Ag. 148, 149; Story, Ag. § 390; 4 Campb. 60, 349, 353. See INSURANCE AGENT.

Consult Livermore, Paley, Ross, Story, Wharton, Agency; Addison, Chitty, Parsons, Story, Contracts; Cross, Lien; Kent, Commentaries; Bouvier, Institutes.

AGENT AND PATIENT.

A phrase indicating the state of a person who is required to do a thing, and is at the same time the person to whom it is done; as, when a man is indebted to another, and he appoints him his executor, the latter is required to pay the debt in his capacity of executor, and entitled to receive it in his own right; he is then agent and patient; Termes de la Ley.

AGER (Lat.). In Civil Law. land generally.

A field;

A portion of land enclosed by definite boundaries.

Used like the word acre in the old English law,

denoting a measure of undetermined and variable value; Spelman, Gloss.; Du Cange; 3 Kent, 441.

AGGRAVATION (Lat. ad, to, and gravis, heavy; aggravare, to make heavy). That which increases the enormity of a crime or the injury of a wrong.

In Criminal Law. One of the rules respecting variances is, that cumulative allegaA sub-agent employed without the knowl- tions, or such as merely operate in aggravaedge or consent of the principal has his remedy tion, are immaterial, provided that sufficient against his immediate employer only, with is proved to establish some right, offence, or regard to whom he will have the same rights, justification included in the claim, charge, or obligations, and duties as if the agent were defence specified on the record. This rule the sole principal. But where sub-agents are runs through the whole criminal law, that it ordinarily or necessarily employed in the busi- | is invariably enough to prove so much of the

« AnteriorContinuar »