Imágenes de páginas
PDF
EPUB

FREDERICK S. MYERS, Respondent, v. THOMAS J. GALLON, Appellant.

Myers v. Gailon, 35 App. Div. 449, affirmed.

(Submitted October 18, 1900; decided November 2, 1900.)

APPEAL from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered December 19, 1898, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict directed by the court.

Matthew Daly for appellant.

Hamilton R. Squier for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs, on opinion below. Concur: PARKER, Ch. J., GRAY, BARTLETT, MARTIN, Vann, CULLEN and WERNER, JJ.

THE CROCKER-WHEELER ELECTRIC COMPANY, Appellant, v. THE JOHNS-PRATT COMPANY, Respondent.

Crocker-Wheeler El. Co. v. Johns-Pratt Co., 29 App. Div. 300, affirmed. (Argued October 18, 1900; decided November 2, 1900.)

APPEAL from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered May 23, 1898, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court at a Trial Term.

Herbert Noble and Howard Hasbrouck for appellant.

William A. Jenner for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: PARKER, Ch. J., GRAY, BARTLETT, MARTIN, Vann, CULLEN and WERNER, JJ.

164a 594 s165 646

CHARLES A. BROWN et al., Composing the Firm of BROWN & FLEMING, Appellants, v. WILLIAM CODY et al., Composing the Firm of CODY BROTHERS, Respondents.

Brown v. Cody, 23 App. Div. 210, affirmed.

(Argued October 18, 1900; decided November 2, 1900.)

APPEAL from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered August 16, 1898, reversing a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon a verdict directed by the court, and an order denying a motion for a new trial, and granting a new trial.

Frederick E. Anderson for appellants.

James W. Ridgway for respondents.

Order affirmed and judgment absolute ordered for defendants on the stipulation, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: PARKER, Ch. J., GRAY, BARTLETT, MARTIN, VANN and WERNER, JJ. Not sitting: CULLEN, J.

164 594 Case 2 169 149

SIMON ROTHSCHILD, Respondent, v. THE RIO GRANDE WESTERN
RAILWAY COMPANY, Appellant.

Rothschild v. Rio Grande W. Ry. Co., 17 App. Div. 635, affirmed.
(Argued October 18, 1900; decided November 2, 1900.)

APPEAL from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered May 17, 1897, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict directed by the court, and an order denying a motion for a new trial.

Roger A. Pryor for appellant.

George Hoadly and William Strauss for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs, on opinion of FOLLETT, J. (84 Hun, 103).

Concur: GRAY, BARTLETT, MARTIN, VANN, CULLEN and WERNER, JJ. Not sitting: PARKER, Ch. J.

SIMON ROTHSCHILD, Respondent, v. THE RIO GRANDE WESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY, Appellant.

Rothschild v. Rio Grande W. Ry. Co., 31 App. Div. 630, affirmed. (Argued October 18, 1900; decided November 2, 1900.)

APPEAL from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered June 22, 1898, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict directed by the court, and an order denying a motion for a new trial.

Roger A. Pryor for appellant.

George Hoadly and William Strauss for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs, on opinion of FOLLETT, J. (84 Hun, 103).

Concur: GRAY, BARTLETT, MARTIN, VANN, CULLEN and WERNER, JJ. Not sitting: PARKER, Ch. J.

SAMUEL W. CASTNER et al., Respondents, v. JOHN DURYEA,
Appellant.

Herbert v. Duryea, 34 App. Div. 478, affirmed.
(Argued October 19, 1900; decided November 2, 1900.)

APPEAL from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered November 23, 1898, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon a verdict directed by the court.

Reuben Leslie Maynard for appellant.

Jacob Marks for respondents.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: BARTLETT, MARTIN, VANN, CULLEN and WERNER, JJ. Not voting: PARKER, Ch. J., and GRAY, J.

HENRY L. HERBERT et al., Respondents, v. JOHN DURYEA,
Appellant.

Herbert v. Duryea, 34 App. Div. 478, affirmed.
(Argued October 19, 1900; decided November 2, 1900.)

APPEAL from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered November 23, 1898, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon a verdict directed by the court.

Reuben Leslie Maynard for appellant.

Jacob Marks for respondents.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: BARTLETT, MARTIN, VANN, CULLEN and WERNER, JJ. Not voting: PARKER, Ch. J., and GRAY, J.

THE DOSORIS POND COMPANY, Respondent, v. EDWard J. CAMPBELL et al., Appellants.

Dosoris Pond Co. v. Campbell, 25 App. Div. 179, affirmed. (Argued October 19, 1900; decided November 2, 1900.)

APPEAL from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered March 8, 1898, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special

Term.

George B. Stoddart for appellants.

Wilmot Townsend Cox for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: PARKER, Ch. J., GRAY, BARTLETT, MARTIN, VANN and WERNER, JJ. Not sitting: CULLEN, J.

LULU EMIL, Respondent, v. FREDERICK ALDHOUS, Appellant.

Emil v. Aldhous, 34 App. Div. 631, affirmed.

(Submitted October 19, 1900; decided November 2, 1900.)

APPEAL from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered November 26, 1898, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict, and an order denying a motion for a new trial.

Joseph N. Tuttle for appellant.

Alex. Blumenstiel for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: PARKER, Ch., J., GRAY, BARTLETT, MARTIN, VANN, CULLEN and WERNER, JJ.

SILAS LAIRD, Respondent, v. FREDERICK M. LITTLEFIELD, Appellant.

Laird v. Littlefield, 34 App. Div. 43, affirmed.

(Submitted October 19, 1900; decided November 2, 1900.)

APPEAL from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered December 12, 1898, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term, and an order denying a motion for a new trial.

Frederick M. Littlefield and George L. Allen for appellant.

Wood & Morschauser for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: PARKER, Ch. J., GRAY, BARTLETT, MARTIN, VANN and WERNER, JJ. Not sitting: CULLEN, J.

« AnteriorContinuar »