« AnteriorContinuar »
BY WILLIAM CRANCH,
POTIUS 10NORATIO JURI8 LITIGIOSA EST, QUAM SCIENTIA.
CIC. DB LBOIBUS. DIAL.I.
DISTRICT OF NEW-YORK, sr:
'DE MI REMEMBERED. that on the fifth day of February, the
J'the thirty-seventh year of the Independence if the United States of America, Isaac Ruey, of the said district, hath depositel in this office the title of a book, the right whereof he claims as proprietor, in the words following, to wit:
“ Reports of Cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of m the United States, in Feliruary terin, 1809 Vol. V by WILLIAM “ÇNANCH, Chief Judge of the Circuit Court of the District of Co“lumbia. Potius ignoratio juris litigiosa est, quam scientia.
« Cic de legibus, dial. i. V IN CONFORMITY to the act of Congress of the United States, en. titled, “ An act for the encouragement of learning. by securing the "' copies of maps, charts and books, to the authors and proprietors of “ sucli copies, during the times therein mentioned;" alid also to an act, entitled, “ In act, supplementary to an act, entitled, an act for * the encouragement of learning, by securing the coping of maps, “ charts and books, to the authors and proprietors of such copies, diu. “ring the times therein mentioned, and extending the benefits thereof * 10 the arts of designing, engraving and etching historical and other " prints."
. CHARLES CLINTON, Clerk of the District of Nov-York.
REPRINTED IN TAIWAN
PAGE Alexander v. Mayor, &c. of Fairfax's Executor v. Fairfax, 19 Alexandria, 1 Fry, Yeaton v.
335 Arthur and Patterson, United States v.
H Auld, Hepburn and Dundag v. 262 - 0. Norwood,
361 Harrison v. Sterry and others, 289
Henderson v. Moore, . 11
262 Bank of Alexandria v. Yeaton 49 Himely v. Rose,
318 - Young v. 45 Hodgkin, Dulany v.
333 Bank of United States v. De. Hodgson v. Mar. Ins. Co. of • veaux et al. .
100 Boardman et al., Hope Insurance Hodgson and Thompson v. Bower. Company v. 57 bank and others,
303 Bodley et al. v. Taylor, 191 Hope Ins. Co. v. Boardman et al. Buwerbank and others, Hodgson and Thompson v.
303 Brent v. Ch.pman,
358 Brown, Taylor and Quarles v. 234 Browne and others v. Strode, 303 Keene v. United States, 304
Kempe's Lessee v. Kennedy, 174
L Chapinan, Brent v.
358 Cook and others v. Woodrow, 13 Logan v. Patrick, Craig, Radford u.
Taylor, Bodley et al. o.
Zane's Lessco, Matthews v. 92
Drike v. Rumney,
Duffield v. Scott,
Beckley v. Bryan,
240 Earl of Thomond v. Earl of Sufo
Booth's Executors v. Armstrong, Errish v. Reeves,
Burnley o. Lambert, 361
Farr v. Newman,
Fenwick v. Barkerdale, 145
109 Frazier v. Steele,
Church v. Hubbart, 339, 340 Fry v. Ezra,