pre-emption right on the east side of a road, the 400 acres allowed for the settlement right must be surveyed entirely on the east side of the road, and in the form of a square. Bodley v. Taylor, 192 5. The call for the settlement right is sufficiently certain, but the call for the pre-emption right is too vague, and must be rejected. Id. ib. 6. A defendant in equity who has ob- tained a patent for land not inclu- ded in his entry, but covered by the complainants' entry, will be decreed to convey it to the com- plainants; but the complainants will not be required to convey to the defendant the land which they have obtained a patent for, which was covered by the defend- ant's entry, but which, by mistake, he omitted to survey. Id.
3. See Kentucky, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6. 4. See Evidence, 3.
5. See Equity, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10. 262 6. The certificate of survey is suffi
cient evidence that the warrant was in the hands of the surveyor. Taylor v. Brown, 234 7. That clause of the land law of lir. ginia, which requires the survey to be recorded within two months after it was made, is merely af rectory to the surveyor; and his ne glect to record it does not invali- date the survey. Id. 8. It is not necessary that the deputy surveyor who made the survey, should make out the plat and cer- tify it. It may be done from his notes by the principal surveyor. Id. ib. 9. A survey is not void because it in. cludes more land than was direct-
1. See Account, 1, 2, 3, 4. 2. Five years' adverse possession of a slave, in Virginia, gives a good ti tle upon which trespass may be maintained. Brent v. Chapman,
« AnteriorContinuar » |