damore) not to extend to the heir of one who died before admittance, but this would seem to have been by the strictness of the custom, Page 31, 32 when destroyed 32, 545 semble, that unity of possession in the lord will destroy the custom of copyhold lands in the nature of gavelkind or borough-English..ib. not destroyed by severance of the freehold to seize as forfeited for want of claim, within a fixed period, is not binding on persons be- yond sea, or under any disability.. 24, 288, 445
semble, that a custom requiring the expression of a husband's consent on the face of the 131 surrender, is not void in law whether a custom negativing the right to sur- render to the use of a will could have been supported 22, n. or would have been bad as suggested by Lord Thurlow in Pike & White, [reference to the judgment delivered by Lord Abinger in Doe & Llewellin, in which the Court of Exchequer inferred that copyholds passed by will, a contrary custom not being found,]212,213, n. confirmation of the decision in Rex v. Rigge, that a custom for the steward to prepare all surrenders is good 531 & n. reference to the customs of the Forest of 602 Knaresborough See DESCENT; EVIDENCE; ESTATE TAIL; FAIR; GUARDIAN; LEET; LUNATIC; PORT- REEVE; PRESENTMENT OF SURRENDER; SUR-
CUSTOMARY COURTS. See COURT BARON, (Customary).
CUSTOMARY FREEHOLDS (or Customary holds, or Privileged Copyholds);
semble, that customary freeholds passing by surrender and admittance, are on a footing with pure copyholds with regard to the bankrupt laws 83, n., 302, n. erroneously stated in Doe & Parke, that cus- tomaryholds were first mentioned in the bank- rupt act of 6 Geo. 4, c. 16 origin and nature of the tenure
were anciently called privileged villenage or
when reputation is admissible evidence a liberal construction of, is induced by the title 29 of freebench attaches to a lineal descent
a particular custom as to descent attaches to an estate pur autre vie
villein socage called by Lord Coke copyholds of frank tenure, 562
and to a rent granted de novo, or reserved out of copyholds and to a resulting use or reversion in fee but where a descent is according to the custom of gavelkind or borough-English, the words "right heirs" were only descriptio persona where there was no limitation to the ancestor, and the descent was to the heir at common law: but now see 3 & 4 Will. 4, c. 106, s. 2.. ib. the custom of descent extends to trust estates, with an exception
CUSTOMARY FREEHOLDS-continued. an inrolment of a customary conveyance under a special custom, held not to be an admit- tance within the stamp act Page 575, n. held in Doe & Danvers, that a will to direct the uses of a surrender of a customary estate, was not within the statute of frauds .. 576 and that such will was not a creation or decla- ration, or assignment of a trust within the 7th section of the act .. ib. semble, that a recovery might have been suf- fered in the Common Pleas of customary freeholds, passing by surrender in a borough .. 563, n. are not within the meaning "frank-tenements," but the tenants have a customary freehold interest, though not a freehold tenure.. 563 not being members of the county court, they were incapable of voting at elections prior to 2 Will. 4, c. 45 566, 567 except for waste, or other freehold land allotted in respect of their customary estate, when the tenure was not altered by act of parlia- ment 557 whether the lord can seize as in the case of ordinary freeholds 566 the wife is not dowable of a trust estate ..568, 569, n. their distinction from ordinary copyhold must be observed in the mode of pleading 568 a custom that the grantee by deed should be admitted in the lifetime of the grantor, is good 24, 284, n., 568, n. a right of entry, when passing by surrender and admittance, was not tolled by descent, 569, n. whether a devise of an equitable interest must
but not to casual services, as fealty, &c. .. ib. Sir Edward Coke and other subsequent writers, following Rastell's ed. of the stats., made this forty years for rents, &c. ib. n. semble that the 50 years was reckoned from the seizin of the ancestor, and not the death of the particular tenant 482 and that the grantor or settler was to have been considered an ancestor of the remainder-man within the meaning of 32 H. 8. ib. the word "predecessor" in the act had rela- tion to corporations only, and not to a tenant for life 482, n. taking possession under a defective title remits to a prior title
plaints in nature of the grand writ of right, 473, 483, &c. the mere writ of right was applicable only to an estate in fee simple 483
but was not alone applicable, as a writ of es- cheat, in nature of a writ of right, lay for the lord on the death of a tenant in fee simple; (but an ejectment is the proper mode of try- ing the lord's title ;) 483, n. the lord had the remedy of formedon in reverter on the death of tenant in tail without heirs inheritable, and there being no remainder, ib. and of intrusion or ejectment, if a copyholder in fee in remainder or reversion died without heirs, and afterwards the tenant for life died, and a stranger entered
ib. even before the stat. de donis the reversioner had the remedy of a formedon in the reverter upon a gift to a man and the heirs of his body, who aliened before he had issue, and afterwards died without any
483 after the stat. de donis, a tenant in tail by de- scent, or in remainder, had a peculiar writ of right called also a formedon ib. but there was no formedon in remainder at common law 55, D.
a formedon was applicable to an entry or abate- ment by a stranger, upon the decease of the ancestor, tenant in tail 483, 484, n.
the writ of formedon was limited by stat. 21 Jac. c. 16, to twenty years 484 the twenty years in the case of a formedon in the descender began to run when the title de-
CUSTOMARY PLAINTS-continued.
scended to the first heir in tail, unless he lay under some legal disability :-and once be- ginning to run, no subsequent disability Page 484 would have availed but a possession even for thirty years might not ib. n. have been adverse the law as to disabilities was altered by 3 & 4 W. 4, c. 27 (post, tit. Ejectment,") App. 1028, &c. the stat. of 21 Jac. rendered the writ of forme- don almost obsolete, the remedy by ejectment being equally available, but a formedon had sometimes been preferred, as affording better means of obtaining information of the title 484 relied upon by the defendant the writ of quod ei deforceat was given by the stat. of Westm. 2 to tenants in tail, and for life, &c., when barred of entry, or by reco- very on non-appearance in a possessory suit, 485 but not after recovery upon defence, and hence ib. n. the practice of common recoveries one coparcener who was deforced by another might have had a writ of right de rationabili parte, distinguishable from the possessory 485 remedy of a nuper obiit plaints in analogy to the above remedies at common law were available to copyholders, plaints in nature of writs of right were not so complicated as real suits at common law, ib. but the same accuracy was requisite in the 486 pleadings the established practice not to allow a demand- ant to amend, confirmed by the cases of Tooth & Boddington and Worley & Blunt, 486, 487 but the rigour of the practice had been relaxed under special circumstances, Webb & Lane, 486
a case in which the court refused to set aside the proceedings for irregularity, in conse- quence of an alteration in the return day of 486, n. the writ of summons when the demandant was not permitted to amend, he was not allowed to discontinue,
487 nor would a new trial have been granted, ex- cept in a case of fraud or where manifest in- justice would have resulted from the refusal,
CUSTOMARY PLAINTS-(continued.)
been enforced by an application to the Court of Common Pleas for a mandate to put the party into possession by the posse manerii, but probably the Court of B. R. would have enforced the execution of the lord's precept Page 489 to the bailiff the judgment would probably be held to sus- 489, n. tain an ejectment the limitation in plaints in nature of the writ of right was sixty years, if founded on the seizin of the ancestor; and thirty years if founded on the demandant's own seizin
but an uninterrupted possession even for sixty years would not have created a title, when the right of entry was suspended by the con- tinuance of a prior estate
an estate might have been enjoyed adversely for many hundred years, and yet been reco- vered by a remainder-man or reversioner in fee, not by writ of right after an adverse pos- session for sixty years, but by ejectment brought within twenty years after the right of entry accrued. Taylor & Horde; Doe & 491 Horde
by 3 & 4 Will. 4, c. 27, entry or action to re- cover land, limited to twenty years, but with an allowance of ten years from the termina- tion of disability App. 1024, &c. and to 40 years even in cases of disability,
App. 1028 See EJECTMENT; FOREIGN COURT; MANDA- MUS; REMITTER.
DECENNARIES; DECINERS [desiners or dozi- ners]; See LEET.
DECINERS; surrenders are taken by, in the manor of Kettering, under a special custom, and presented and inroiled at the following 126, n.
DE DONIS, statute of, does not extend to 54, &c., 86 copy holds DEFORCEMENT; its nature defined (tit. Cus- 474, &c. tomary Plaints) DEMESNES; the word in its ordinary significa- tion is applicable only to the lands which the lord of the manor either actually or po- 662, n. tentially has, in propriis manibus after severance they cannot reunite, if the de- 14 misable quality has been destroyed no ground for a supposed distinction between a tenancy escheating, and a purchase by the
and cannot be claimed by prescription formerly, but no longer, disposed of by the crown for charitable uses
no longer any distinction between the death of a person being and not being within the age of discretion, when killed by any animal, 644, 645
a clear distinction between death occasioned in aquá dulci and aquá salsá 645 in the latter there can be no deodand, even if it be an arm of the sea ib. the merchandize of a ship is not forfeited by a death occasioned by a fall from the vessel, 646, n. that which is the immediate cause of death, as a wheel of a carriage, or part of the loading of it, is alone forfeited 645, 646, 647 but formerly all things moving to the death were considered deodands 645 & n. the value of the wheel, or other thing forfeited, is set by the coroner's inquest, and taken in lieu of it 645
when the violence of a stream is influential to the death, a horse or carriage on or in which the person is riding will not be forfeited, 646 it is immaterial to whom the ownership of that
which is the cause of death may belong ib. nothing can be forfeited as a deodand which forms part of, or is affixed to, the freehold, 646, 647 whether a hay-rick is forfeited when the death is occasioned by a fall from it 647, n.
DEPOSIT; the rule that it creates an equitable
mortgage confirmed See COPIES OF COURT ROLL.
DERELICT LANDS, belong to the crown, but lands imperceptibly added to demesnes by alluvion, &c., belong to the lord,
32, 33, 666, n. DESCENT; of copyholds is governed by the rules of common law 27, 28, 29, 43
a person may take as heir in special tail without being heir general
but no person can prescribe a mode of descent not sanctioned by the general rule of law, or by custom the heir would have taken by descent, and not by purchase, when the two rights met, 43, 143 so when there was a limitation in the same in- strument to the ancestor for life 30 the cases went upon the supposition that the heir had no election 275 the rule extended equally to a devise to the heir with an executory devise over, and to a devise from the heir upon a contingency, ib. and to a devise to the heir, charged with debts, 44, 276 by 3 & 4 Will. 4, c. 106, under a devise to the heir, he takes by the will, and not by descent, 43, n., 143, n. a limitation to the person conveying, or his heirs, will create an estate by purchase, s. 4, 44, n., 143, n., 295, n. and a lineal ancestor takes as heir, in preference to collaterals, s. 6 143, n. so a father is preferred to a brother or sister, 43, n., 143, n.
when the descent is according to the custom of borough-English or gavelkind, a younger child is not compellable to bring a copyhold into hotchpot
of copyholds would not have tolled an entry, (and see 3 & 4 Will. 4, c. 27, s. 39) 46 a right of entry no longer barred by.. 47, n. 86, n., 377, n. semble, that under a limitation to A. and his heirs, or his executors or administrators, for the life of B., the heirs in the one case, and the executors or administrators in the other, would take as special occupants, and not by descent 351, n. observations on the subject of descent of copy- holds enfranchised under 4 & 5 Vict. c. 35, 26, 27, D. See BOROUGH-ENGLISH; COPYHOLDS; CUS TOM; DEVISE; ENCROACHMENT; GAVEL
DEVISE; a limitation by will to A. and his heirs, and if he should die without leaving any child, to B., creates a fee conditional, there being no custom to intail Page 55, n. by 1 Vict. c. 26, copyholds and customary freeholds are devisable, with the formalities prescribed by s. 9.-(A general reference to the statute in p. 233, n.) 211, n., 233, n. and the right extends to estates pur autre vie, (s. 3) 52, 125, n., 233, n. and to contingent, executory, and other future interests, (s. 3) 138, n., 418, n. by custom copyholds were devisable without a surrender to will, even before the late stat. of 55 Geo. 3, c. 192 lands possessed at the date of the will passed by a general devise, although the words of a subsequent surrender to will were future,
a devise containing a description applicable to after purchased lands would have passed them, when surrendered to uses already de- clared 214 a feme covert cannot devise pursuant to a sur- render made when sole 128, 129, 215, 267 by a joint tenant pursuant to a surrender to will, is good, though the surrender be not presented till after his death since 1 Vict. c. 26, a parol will of copyholds, and a parol revocation of a will, not good, 235, n.
prior to the late stat. of 55 Geo. 3, c. 192, a general devise of all real estates wonld not have passed copyholds (but see Doe & Lud- lam, infra)
236 unless under an evident or constructive inten- tion ib. the intention was implied from a surrender to will 236, 239 the cases of Chapman & Hart, and Byas & Byas 236, 237 implied also when the testator had no freeholds, 237, 238 reference to Church & Mundy and Judd & Pratt, &c. ib. presumption of the intention would
not have been raised, even in favour of creditors, where there were freeholds 236, 238 unless the freeholds were insufficient, 236, 238, 239 distinction between creditors, and wife or chil- dren, in raising the presumption of intention, 238, 239 when the intention would have been presumed from superadded words, such as "which I have surrendered to the use of my will," or "and which I have surrendered, &c.," or "the copyhold parts thereof having been sur- rendered, &c." 239, 240
the cases of Strutt & Finch and Oxenforth & Cawkwell 240
the words "freehold and copyhold lands" raised the presumption of passing unsur- rendered copyholds, even if the testator possessed others which had been surrendered, Page 241
authorities and dicta which appeared to the author to be irreconcilable with the case of Doe & Ludlam, which decided that after the act of 55 Geo. 3, c. 192, a general devise of real estates would pass copyholds not surren- dered to will, although the testator had free- holds 241, &c. the decision in Doe & Ludlam confirmed by the Vice Chancellor 242, n. the rule in Rose & Bartlett, 7 Car. 1, excluding leaseholds from the operation of a general devise of land, did not apply to leases for lives 241, n. whether under a general devise of lands, copy- holds of inheritance and leaseholds for years would have passed (Roe d. Pye v. Bird), 246, 247 whether the act of 55 Geo. 3 supplied a sur- render in favour of a power of sale 247 or so as to defeat a widow's freebench ib., n. the construction is not governed by any express legal terms, but the intention is the guide,
copyholds pass by the words "my copyhold ground rent ib., n. the words " property," "estate," &c., may pass the interest as well as the land.. 247, 248 whether the fee will pass to executors in trust to sell, by the words "goods, chattels, estate and effects" 248, n. even the words " personal estate or property will pass copyholds, where the intention is clear
Paris & Miller, in which the word "share was held to pass the fee, decided on the ef- fect of that word alone, and the devise being of the actual existing interest 248, 249, n. by 28 s. of 1 Vict. c. 26, the fee or other whole estate passes without words of limitation, un- less a contrary intention appears 249, n. the whole remainder of all those lands, &c, after a devise for life, held to pass a fee,
and of the words "all I am worth, &c." ib. a charge which might continue beyond the life of the devisee will induce the construction of a fee 250 so also a charge in gross, or of debts, &c. ib. but only where the devisee is charged person.. ally 250, n. general words or terms of locality may restrain the effect of the word "estate," &c. 250 but the words "all the said estates," engrafted on a devise of "messuages, lands," &c. for life, pass a fee 251
an estate in fee in a prior devisee, may be im- plied from subsequent limitations ib.
a fee will pass by an exception out of land devised in fee 251, n.
« AnteriorContinuar » |