CANADIAN LAW TIMES Edited by E. DOUGLAS ARMOUR, Q.C., Of Osgoode Hall, Barrister-at-Law. VOL. XVIII. TORONTO: THE CARSWELL CO. (LIMITED), PUBLISHERS. 1899. Entered according to Act of the Parliament of Canada, in the year one thousand eight hundred and ninety-nine, by THE CARSWELL CO. (Limited) in the office of the Minister of Agriculture. LIBRARY OF THE LELAND STANFORD, JR., UNIVERSITY LAW DEPARTMENT. TABLE OF CASES. Those marked are not reported in the regular or official reports of the Dominion and Provinces. Abel, Ex p., 502. Abell v. Craig, 90, 296. Adams v. Hockin, 32. *Advocates, In re, 159. Aldrich v. Nest Egg Co., 464, 499. Alexander v. Irondale, Bancroft, and Ottawa R. W. Co., 24, 58. Alexander v. McAllister, 518. Allan v. Clougher, 330. Allan v. Manitoba and North-West ern R. W. Co., 148. Allen v. Ontario and Rainy River Alley v. Canada Life Assce. Co., 551. Anderson v. Henry, 378. Andrew v. Canadian Mutual L. & I. Annapolis Election, In re, 517. Armstrong, 80. Armstrong v. Harrison, 112. Arthur v. Runians, 357. Arthur v. Yeadon, 522. Ash Estate, In re, 537. V. Atanasse, In re-Reg. v. Redner, 94. 542. Auchterlony v. Palgrave Gold Mining Co., 542. Auer Incandescent Light Mfg. Co. v. Dreschel, 209. Augberg v. Anderson, 528. Babe v. Board of Trade of Toronto, 405. Bain v. Anderson, 284. Baker v. Forest City Lodge, I. O. O. F., 446. Baker v. Stuart, 174, 392. Baker v. Trusts and Guarantee Co., 264. Balderson v. The Queen, 209. Bank of Montreal v. Horne, 479, 546. Bank of Nova Scotia v. Fish, 440. Bank of Toronto v. Ins. Co. of North America, 69. Bank of Toronto v. Keystone Fire Ins. Co., 58, 217. Bank of Toronto v. Quebec Fire Ins. Co., 58. Banks v. Batton, 522. Banque d' Hochelaga v. Maritime R. W. News Co., 89, 495, 520. Banque du Peuple v. Trottier, 437. Barber v. Crathern, 18. Barker v. Lawrence, 495. Barnes v. Gray, 537. Barrowman v. Fader, 463, 535. London Free Press Printing Co., 22. Battisby v. Witherspoon-In re Forster, 83. Bauld v. Ross, 532. Bayne v. Eastern Trust Co., 549. Bell Telephone Co. and City of Hamilton, In re, 287. Bennett v. Coatsworth-In re Ferguson, 101. *Bennington, In re, 239. 76930 |