Imágenes de páginas
PDF
EPUB

court or judge may allow, the statement, together with any objections made or amendments proposed by any party, shall be presented to the court or the judge, and if the statement be true, complete and properly prepared, it shall be approved by the court or judge, and if it be not true, complete or properly prepared, it shall be made so under the direction of the court or judge and shall then be approved. When approved, it shall be filed in the clerk's office and become a part of the record for the purpose of the appeal.

(c) If any difference arise between the parties concerning directions as to the general contents of the record to be prepared on the appeal, such difference shall be submitted to the court or judge in conformity with the provisions of paragraph b of this rule and shall be covered by the directions which the court or judge may give on the subject.

Rule 76. Record on appeal-Reduction and preparation-Costs-Correction of omissions. In preparing the transcript on an appeal, especial care shall be taken to avoid the inclusion of more than one copy of the same paper and to exclude the formal and immaterial parts of all exhibits, documents and other papers included therein; and for any infraction of this or any kindred rule the appellate court may withhold or impose costs as the circumstances of the case and the discouragement of like infractions in the future may require. Costs for such an infraction may be imposed upon offending solicitors as well as parties.

If, in the transcript, anything material to either party be omitted by accident or error, the appellate court, on a proper suggestion or its own motion, may direct that the omission be corrected by a supplemental transcript.

Rule 77. Record on appeal-Agreed statement. When the questions presented by an appeal can be determined

by the appellate court without an examination of all the pleadings and evidence, the parties, with the approval of the district court or the judge thereof, may prepare and sign a statement of the case showing how the questions arose and were decided in the district court and setting forth so much only of the facts alleged and proved, or sought to be proved, as is essential to a decision of such questions by the appellate court. Such statement, when filed in the office of the clerk of the district court, shall be treated as superseding, for the purpose of the appeal, all parts of the record other than the decree from which the appeal is taken, and, together with such decree, shall be copied and certified to the appellate court as the record on appeal.

Whenever

Rule 78. Affirmation in lieu of oath. under these rules an oath is or may be required to be taken, the party may, if conscientiously scrupulous of taking an oath, in lieu thereof make solemn affirmation to the truth of the facts stated by him.

Rule 79. Additional rules by district court. With the concurrence of a majority of the circuit judges for the circuit, the district courts may make any other and further rules and regulations for the practice, proceedings and process, mesne and final, in their respective districts, not inconsistent with the rules hereby prescribed, and from time to time alter and amend the same.

Rule 80. Computation of time-Sundays and holidays. When the time prescribed by these rules for doing any act expires on a Sunday or legal holiday, such time shall extend to and include the next succeeding day that is' not a Sunday or legal holiday.

Rule 81. These rules effective February 1, 1913—Old rules abrogated. These rules shall be in force on and

after February 1, 1913, and shall govern all proceedings in cases then pending or thereafter brought, save that where in any then pending cause an order has been made or act done which cannot be changed without doing substantial injustice, the court may give effect to such order or act to the extent necessary to avoid any such injustice.

All rules theretofore prescribed by the supreme court, regulating the practice in suits of equity, shall be abrogated when these rules take effect.

[blocks in formation]

Bank of the United States v. De

veaux, 5 Cranch 61: 49, 51, 83. Bankers Trust Co. v. Texas, etc., R. Co., 241 U. S. 295: 51-52. Barney v. Baltimore City, 6 Wall. 280: 145.

Barney v. Latham, 103 U. S. 205: 124.

Barrow Steamship Co. v. Kane, 170

U. S. 100: 46, 50.

Baylis v. Travellers' Ins. Co., 113

U. S. 316: 133.

Beal v. Somerville, 50 Fed. 652: 67. Bennett v. Butterworth, 11 How. 669: 4.

Bergman v. Bly, 66 Fed. 40: 61. Biddle v. United States, 156 U. S. 759: 113.

Blake v. McClung, 172 U. S. 239: 48.

Blake v. McKim, 103 U. S. 336: 123. Blythe v. Hinckley, 173 U. S. 501:

58.

Bonner v. Gorman, 213 U. S. 86: 106.

Boyce v. Grundy, 3 Pet. 210: 18. Boyd v. United States, 116 U. S. 616: 32.

Boyle v. Zacharie, 6 Pet. 658: 20. Brine v. Insurance Co., 96 U. S. 627: 19.

Bucher v. Cheshire R. Co., 125 U. S.

555: 6, 13, 61, 62.

Burgess v. Seligman, 107 U. S. 20: 46, 63.

Butts v. Merchants, etc., Transportation Co., 230 U. S. 126: 32. Buzard v. Houston, 119 U. S. 347: 18.

C

Cable v. United States Ins. Co., 191
U. S. 288: 126.
California v. Southern Pacific Co.,
157 U. S. 229: 83, 84, 86.
Callan v. Wilson, 127 U. S. 540: 32.
Carpenter v. Providence Washington

Insurance Co., 16 Pet. 495: 13, 15. Central R. of New Jersey v. New Jersey West Line R. Co., 32 N. J. Eq. 67: 61.

Chesapeake, etc., R. Co. v. McCabe, 213 U. S. 207: 130, 131. Chisholm v. Georgia, 2 Dall. 419: 45, 89.

City of Chicago v. Robbins, 2 Black. 418: 15.

« AnteriorContinuar »