Comentarios de la gente - Escribir un comentario
No encontramos ningún comentario en los lugares habituales.
Otras ediciones - Ver todas
Outline of the Jurisdiction and Procedure of the Federal Courts (Classic ...
Joseph Ragland Long
Sin vista previa disponible - 2017
Outline of the Jurisdiction and Procedure of the Federal Courts
Joseph Ragland Long
Sin vista previa disponible - 2016
action admiralty allowed amended answer application appointed authority bill brought cause CHAPTER charge chief circuit court citizens City civil claims clerk Code commerce Congress constitute controversy copy counties court of appeals date last mentioned day of July decisions decree defendant deputy determine direct district court district judge district shall include division duties eastern division effect equity established exercise fact federal courts filed final follows fourth Government granted hearing held holding include the territory interest issue judge judgment judicial June jurisdiction justice known maintain March marshal matter Mondays in April necessary nineteen hundred northern division November October original party person petition plaintiff proceedings question record removal Reports require reside Rule second Monday September southern Stat statute suit Supreme Court taken Terms territory embraced therein thereof tion trial Tuesday United unless Washington western district writ of error
Página 22 - International law is part of our law, and must be ascertained and administered by the courts of justice of appropriate jurisdiction, as often as questions of right depending upon it are duly presented for their determination.
Página 100 - A final judgment or decree in any suit, in the highest court of law or equity of a state in which a decision in the suit could be had, where is drawn in question the validity of a treaty or statute of, or an authority exercised under the United States, and the decision is against their validity...
Página 99 - States, and the decision is in favor of their validity; or where any title, right, privilege, or immunity is claimed under the constitution, or any treaty or statute of or commission held or authority exercised under the United States, and the decision is against the title, right, privilege, or immunity specially set up or claimed by either party under such constitution, treaty, statute, commission, or authority, — may be re-examined, and reversed or affirmed in tha supreme court upon a writ of...
Página 338 - I do solemnly swear that I will administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich; and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge all the duties incumbent on me as , according to the best of my abilities and understanding, agreeably to the constitution and laws of the United States.
Página 29 - There is no position which depends on clearer principles than that every act of a delegated authority contrary to the tenor of the commission under which it is exercised is void. No legislative act, therefore, contrary to the Constitution, can be valid.
Página 127 - States, he may make and file a petition in such suit in such state court at the time, or any time before the defendant is required by the laws of the State or the rule of the state court in which such suit is brought, to answer or plead to the declaration or complaint of the plaintiff...
Página 338 - Of all civil causes of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction; saving to suitors, in all cases, the right of a common-law remedy, where the common law is competent to give it.
Página 22 - For this purpose, where there is no treaty, and no controlling executive or legislative act or judicial decision, resort must be had to the customs and usages of civilized nations; and, as evidence of these, to the works of jurists and commentators, who by years of labor, research and experience, have made themselves peculiarly well acquainted with the subjects of which they treat.
Página 29 - The interpretation of the laws is the proper and peculiar province of the courts. A constitution is in fact, and must be, regarded by the judges as a fundamental law. It therefore belongs to them to ascertain its meaning as well as the meaning of any particular act proceeding from the legislative body.