 SPS. Specifically: • The Department had not economically justified its investment in the program because its latest (January 2000) analysis of costs and benefits was not credible. Further, this analysis showed that the system, as defined, was not a...  The Standard Procurement System (SPS): Can the DOD Procurement Process be ... - Página 17por United States. Congress. House. Committee on Government Reform. Subcommittee on National Security, Veterans Affairs, and International Relations - 2003 - 90 páginasVista completa - Acerca de este libro
 | 2005 - 416 páginas
...program because its latest (January 2000) analysis of costs and benefits was not credible. Further, this analysis showed that the system, as defined, was not a cost-beneficial investment. • The Department had not effectively addressed the inherent risks associated with investing in a... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Armed Services - 2005 - 412 páginas
...program because its latest (January 2000) analysis of costs and benefits was not credible. Further, this analysis showed that the system, as defined, was not a cost-beneficial investment. • The Department had not effectively addressed the inherent risks associated with investing in a... | |
 | 46 páginas
...program because its latest (January 2000) analysis of costs and benefits was not credible. Further, this analysis showed that the system, as defined, was not a cost-beneficial investment. • The department had not effectively addressed the inherent risks associated with investing in a... | |
| |
