The Standard Procurement System (SPS): Can the DOD Procurement Process be Standardized? : Hearing Before the Subcommittee on National Security, Veterans Affairs, and International Relations of the Committee on Government Reform, House of Representatives, One Hundred Seventh Congress, Second Session, February 7, 2002
United States. Congress. House. Committee on Government Reform. Subcommittee on National Security, Veterans Affairs, and International Relations
U.S. Government Printing Office, 2003 - 90 páginas
Comentarios de la gente - Escribir un comentario
No encontramos ningún comentario en los lugares habituales.
Otras ediciones - Ver todas
Accounting achieve acquisition actions additional agencies approach audit believe benefits better billion budget Chairman commitments committee Component concerns continue contract contract management contractor cost decisions Defense Procurement Department of Defense Department's deployed deployment determine directed Director economic analysis effort end users enhance ensure estimates example existing expected fact findings follows fully functionality future goals going GOVERNMENT implement important improve increase incremental information technology initiated investment issues justified legacy LIEBERMAN look LYNCH major measures meet ment milestone MYERS Office operational oversight percent performance plans positive problems program manager projects PUTNAM question recognize recommendations releases replace requirements responsibility result risk satisfaction schedule SPS program staff Standard Procurement System statement steps subcommittee testimony testing Thank tion understand users WILLEMSSEN
Página 76 - Chairman, for the opportunity to appear before this committee. I will be pleased to answer any questions you may have.
Página 25 - Budget (OMB) guidance 11 emphasize the need to have investment management processes and information to help ensure that IT projects are being implemented at acceptable costs and within reasonable and expected time frames and that they are contributing to tangible, observable improvements in mission performance (ie, that projects are meeting the cost, schedule, and performance commitments upon which their approval was justified).
Página 52 - Do you solemnly swear or affirm that the testimony you are about to give to this subcommittee is the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help you God ? Mr.
Página 1 - The subcommittee met, pursuant to notice, at 11:10 am. in room 2247, Rayburn House Office Building, Hon. Christopher Shays (chairman of the subcommittee) presiding. Staff present: Lawrence J. Halloran, staff director and counsel; Kate Hickey and Robert Newman, professional staff members; Thomas M.
Página 53 - Mr. Chairman, this concludes my testimony. I would be happy to answer any questions you or other members of the subcommittee may have.
Página 14 - Will you please stand and raise your right hand? Do you solemnly swear or affirm that the testimony you...
Página 17 - SPS. Specifically: • The Department had not economically justified its investment in the program because its latest (January 2000) analysis of costs and benefits was not credible. Further, this analysis showed that the system, as defined, was not a cost-beneficial investment. • The Department had not effectively addressed the inherent risks associated with investing in a program as large and lengthy as SPS because it had not divided the program into incremental investment decisions that coincided...
Página 32 - BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON NATIONAL SECURITY, VETERANS AFFAIRS AND INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS, HOUSE COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT REFORM ON THE STANDARD PROCUREMENT SYSTEM FEBRUARY 7, 2002 Mr.