IN THE COURT OF EXCHEQUER AT WESTMINSTER, MICHAELMAS TERM, 27TH VICTORIA. BEFORE THE RIGHT HON. THE LORD CHIEF BARON POLLOCK, MR. BARON BRAMWELL, MR. BARON CHANNELL, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL . SILLEM AND OTHERS, Claiming the Vessel " ALEXANDRA," seized under the Foreign Enlistment Act, (59 George III. Chapter 69.) REPORT OF THE ARGUMENTS ON THE APPLICATION OF THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL FOR LEAVE TO MOVE FOR A NEW TRIAL AFTER THE FIRST FOUR DAYS OF TERM, RESULTING IN A RULE NISI TO SHOW CAUSE WHY A NEW TRIAL SHOULD NOT BE HAD, LONDON: PRINTED BY GEORGE E. EYRE AND WILLIAM SPOTTISWOODE, PRINTERS TO THE QUEEN'S MOST EXCELLENT MAJESTY, FOR HER MAJESTY'S STATIONERY OFFICE. 1864. 24/25 1866, Jan. 14. Hon. Charles Sumner, Counsel for the Crown. The Attorney General-Sir ROUNDELL PALMER, Knight. Mr. LOCKE, Q.C., M.P. Mr. T. JONES. Counsel for the Claimants. Sir HUGH MCCALMONT CAIRNS, Knight, Q.C. Mr. KARSLAKE, Q.C. Mr. MELLISH, Q.C. Mr. KEMPLAY. Solicitor for the Crown. Mr. F. J. HAMEL, Solicitor for Her Majesty's Customs. Solicitors for the Claimants. Mr. E. L. ROWCLIFFE, (GREGORY, ROWCLIFFE and Co.,) London. Agents for Messrs. FLETCHER and HULL, Liverpool. CONTENT S. Argument on Application for leave to move for New Trial after the Expiration of the First Four Days of Term Motion to apply the Common Law Procedure Acts 1852 and Copy Rule of Court 232 15 Copy Rule Nisi Decree pronounced on 2d August 1862 by the Judge of the iv N.B. To render intelligible the frequent reference made by Counsel to the reports of the trial, it may be observed that two copies have been printed, the one for the Crown containing an appendix and termed by Counsel the LAREGR copy, and the other for the claimants termed by Counsel the SMALLER copy. There is no substantial difference between the two reports, the variances consisting chiefly of clerical inaccuracies for the most part rectified in the larger book. |