Imágenes de páginas
PDF
EPUB

847

438

796

500, 501

B12

488

Pet. 233

16

395

Railroad Companies o. Chamber | Shepley v. Cowan, 91 U. S. 830, 475 lain, 6 Wall. 748

519 Railroad Company v. Collector, 100 Sherman v. Fitch, 98 Mass. 59 352 U. S. 596

650 Shirras V. Caig & Mitchell, 7 - v. Grant, 98 U. S. 308

Cranch, 34

631 - v. Howard, 7 Wall. 392 183 Shorter v. Smith, 9 Ga. 517 - v. James, 6 Wall. 750 845, 848 Silver Lake Bank v. North, 4 Johns. - v. Rose, 95 U. S. 78 649 | (N. Y.) Ch. 370

628 - ». Tennessee, 101 U.S. 337 834

Singer Manufacturing Co. v. Wil. Railway Company v. Alling, 99

son, 2 Ch. D. 434

61, 65 U. S. 463

7111

Smith v. Acker, 23 Wend. (N. Y.) Randall v. Howard, 2 Black, 685 654

653

739 Reed v. Norris, 2 Myl. & Cr. 301 601 - v. Brotherline, 62 Pa. St. Removal Cases, 100 U. S. 467 187, 298,

461

- v. Crouse, 24 Barb. (N. Respublica v. Sparhawk, 1 Dall.

433 357

- v. Falconer, 11 Hun (N. Y.), Rex v. Foxcroft, 2 Burr. 1017

481 Reynolds v. Commissioners of Stark

- v. Goodyear Dental VulcanCounty, 5 Ohio, 204

625

ite Co., 93 U. S. 480 Rhode Island v. Massachusetts, 16

v. Ramsay, 6 Serg. & R. 688

(Pa.) 673 Rice v. Railroad Company, 1 Black,

- v. Richards, 13 Pet. 26 637 358

- v. United States, 10 Pet. 326 706 Ridgway v. Wharton, 6 II. L. Cas. Snevily v. Ekel, 1 Watts & S. (Pa.) 237

203

70 Riggs v. Murray, 2 Johns. (N. Y.) Spencer v. Howe, 26 Conn. 200 267 Ch. 565

239 Sianley v. Stanton, 36 Ind. 445 142 Roberts v. Bolles, 101 U. S. 119 415 Stanton v. Camp, 4 Barb. (N. Y.) Robinson v. Plimpton, 25 N. Y.484 13 274 Roemer v. Simon, '95 Ú. S. 214 492, 493 Starin v. The Town of Genoa, 23 Roosa v. Crist, 11 III. 450 121, 122 N. Y. 439

675 Rouse v. Southard, 39 Me. 404 141 Stark v. Starr, 94 U. S. 477 507 Rowan v. Runnels, 5 How. 134 686 - v. Starrs, 6 Wall. 402 261, 375, Rubber Company v. Goodyear, 9

607 Wall. 788

841 Stark weather v. American Bible Runyan v. The Lessee of Coster, Society, 72 III. 60

3 57, 358 14 Pet. 122

354, 356 State v. Binder, 38 Mo. 450 684 Ruggles v. Inhabitants of Nan.

- v. Linn County, 44 Mo. tucket, 11 Cush. (Mass.) 433

080, 885 Russell v. Perkins, 1 Mas. 308

- v. Sutterfield, 54 Mo. 391 681 Rutherford v. Greene's Heirs, 2 State, ex rel. Woodson, v. BrassWheat. 196

field, 07 Mo. 331

679 Ryder v. Wombwell, Law Rep. 4 Steamboat Company v. McCutchen Ex. 32

18, 844 & Collins, 13 Pa. St. 13 184, 351

Stearns v. Page, 7 How. 819 1 40 Salomon v. United States, 19 Wall. Stewart v. States, 6 Duer (N. Y.), 17

649
83

742 Salter v. Hite, 7 Bro. P. C. 189 2 54

- v. Trenier, 49 Ala. 492 802 Sanderson ». Stuckdale, 11 Md. 583 690 Stockdale v. Insurance Companies, Sawyer v. Turpin, 91 Ú. S. 114 743 20 Wall. 323

649 Schmidt v. Braunn, 10 La. An. 26 303 Stokes v. Saltonstall, 13 Pet. 181 463 Schulenburg v. Ilarriman, 21 Wall. Stooks v. Smith, 100 Mass. 63 272

509 Stranahan v. East Haddam, 11 Scull v. United States, 98 U. S.

Conn. 607

273 410

706, 825, 827,830 Stryker v. Polk County, 22 Iowa, Seaburn's Executors v. Seaburn, 15

137 Gratt. (Va.) 423

307,368 Stuart v. Corning, 32 Conn. 105 207 Secretary v. McGarrahan, 9 Wall. Sturges v. Burton, 8 Ohio St. 215 192 298

475 - v. The Collector, 12 Wall. Seixo v. Provezende, Law Rep. 1 .

790 Ch. 192

64 Succession v. Ludwig, 3 Rob. (La.) Sexton r. Wheaton, 8 Wheat. 229 227

803 Sbaw v. Cooper, 7 Pet. 292

Sumner v. Hicks, 2 Black, 532

504

780

19

[ocr errors]

4841

627

45

405

l'urn

458

42

389

387

Supervisors v. United States, 18 | Toker v. Toker, 3 De G., J. & S. Wall. 71

686 486 Supervisors of Mercer County v. Tool Company v. Norris, 2 Wall. Hubbard, 45 III. 139

122

Town of Eagle v. Kolin, 84 Ill. Tappan v. Evans, 11 N. II. 311 691 292 Tatham v. Wright, 2 Russ. & M. 1 253 Town of Keithsburg v. Frick, 34 Taylor v. Blacklow, 3 Bing. N. C.

III 405 235

500 Town of Middleport v. Ætna Life - v. Carpenter, 2 Sandf.

Insurance Co., 82 III. 662 (N. Y.) C. 603

Town of Weyauwega v. Ayling, - v. McClung, 2 lloust. (Del.) 99 U. S. 112 24

Township of Elmwood v. Marcy, - v. Plymouth, 8 Metc. (Mass.) 92 U. S. 289

19 Transportation Line v. Hope, 95 - v. Thompson, 42 III. 9 411.

U. S. 297

412, 413, 414 Trenier v. Stewart, 65 Ala. 458 810 -- v. Wetmore, 10 Ohio, 490 51 Trist v. Child, 21 Wall. 441 111, 112 Tennessee v. Sneed, 96 U. S. 69438 Trustees of Dartmouth College v. Terrell v. Allison, 21 Wall. 289 8 49 Woodward, 4 Wheat, 618 639, 816, Terry v. Tubman, 92 U. S. 156 213

819 Thayer v. New England Litho Turner v. Adams, 46 Mo. 95 690

graphic Co., 1C8 Mass. 521 193 The Abbotsforil, 98 U. S. 440 261 United States v. Arredondo, 6 Pet. The Adela, 6 Wall. 200

691

509 The Admiral, 3 Wall. 609

- v. Babbitt, 1 Black, 55 202, 626 The Anne, 3 Wheat. 435

- v. Boisdoré, 11 How. 63 707 The Atlantic and The Ogdens

v. Bowen, 100 U. S. 508 36 burgh, 1 Newb. Adm. 139

v. D'Auterieve, 15 How. 14 701, The Bee, 1 Ware, 332 380

703 The Blackwall, 10 Wall. 1

v. Forbes, 15 Pet. 173 707 The Camanche, 8 Wall. 448 390

v. Giles, 9 Cranch, 212 549 The Elizabeth and Jane, 1 Ware,

v. King, 7 How. 833 705, 707 35

386

v. Lawrence, 3 Dall. 42 700 The Emblem, 2 Ware, 61

390

- v. Lawson, 101 U. S. 164 172 The Gustaf, 1 Lush. 500

301

v. Lee, 2 Cranch C. C. 462 600 The Hiram, 1 Wheat, 440

- v. Lent, 1 Paine, 417 600 The Hope, 3 C. Rob. 215

388

- v. Macdonald, 5 Wall. 647 105, The Prerogative, 12 Rep. 13 18

173 The Schooner Boston, 1 Sumn.

-0, - , 2 Cliff. 270 166, 173 328

388, 390

v. Percheman, 7 Pet 51 706 The Santissima Trinidad, 7 Wheat.

-0. State Bank, 96 U. S. 33 184 283

- v. Throckmorton, 89 U. S. The Ship Ewbank, 1 Sumn. 400 387

61

4 78, 479, 520 The Sir William Peel, 5 Wall. 517 42 - v. Walker, 22 How. 299165 The Trelawney, 3 C. Rob 216 390 - v. Wiggins, 14 Pet. 334 706 The Undaunted, 1 Lush. 90

Utley v. Donaldson, 94 U. S. 29 50, 396 The William Bagaley, 5 Wall. 377 617 Thomas's Adm’rs v. Vankapff's Van Horn r. Fonda, 5 Johns. (N. Y.) Ex'rs, 6 Gill & J. (Md.) 372

Ch. 388 Thomasson, Adm'r, v. Brown, 43 Van Norden v. Morton, 99 U. S. Ind. 203

378 Thompson v. Brown, 4 Johns. Veazie Bank v. Fenno, 8 Wall. (N. Y.) C. 619

553 - v New York & Hudson Vidal v. Girard's Executors, 2 How. River Railroad Co., 3 Sandf.

127 (N. Y.) Cl3. 625

626 Voorhees v. Bonesteel and Wife, 16 Thoroughgood's Case, 4 Coke, 4 585 Wall. 16 Thurmond and Others v. Reese, 3 Ga. 449

690 | Walker v. Whitehead, 16 Wall. Ticonie Bank v. Harvey, 16 Iowa,

314 141

690 Walton v. Crowley, 3 Blatchf. 440 Tilton v. Cofield, 93 U. S. 163 406 Ward v. Chamberlain, 2 Black, Tissot v. Darling, 9 Cal. 278

430

584

42

320

[ocr errors]

328 646

16

Ward v. The Griswoldville Manu. | Williamson v. Moriarty, 19 W. R. facturing Co., 040 10 wall. 646 519 Conn 593 215 818

500 Warren u. Van Brunt, 19 Wall. 646 519 Wilcox v. Jackson, 13 Pet. 498 769, 770 Watkins v. Carlton, 10 Leigh (Va.), Wilton v. The Railroads, 1 Wall. 560

Jr. 195

493

Wirth v. Branson, 98 U. S. 118 261 ton, 1 Russ. & Myl. 602

Wolcott v. Des Moines Company, Webb v. La Fayette County, 67 5 Wall. 681 2 77, 766, 774. 777 Mo, 353

679 Wolfe v. Barnett & Lyon, 24 La. Weeks v. Flower, 9 La. 385

An. 97 Wescott v. Gunn, 4 Duer (N. Y.), Wollaston v. Tribe, Law Rep. 9 Eq. 107

44

230 Westerman v. Cape Girardeau Wood v. Dummer, 3 Mass. 308 213

County, 7 Cent. Law Jour. 354 679 - v. Strickland, 2 Ves. & Bea. Westray v. United States, 18 Wall.

150

644 322

179 Woodgate v. Field, 2 Hare, 211 645 West ». Schnebly, 54 Ill. 523 375 Wotherspoon v. Currie, Law Rep. Wheeler v. Smith et al., 9 Hlow. 65 367 6 Ap. Cas. 508; 27 L. T. N. 8. 303 66

- v. Willard, 44 Vt. 641 501 Wright v. Compton, 53 Ind. 337 464 White v. Corlies, 46 N. Y. 407

Wynne et al. v. Cornelison et al., White Water Valley Canal Co. v. 52 Ind. 312

138, 142 Vallette, 21 How. 414

626 Williams v. Baker, 17 Wall. 144 277, Yates v. Groves, 1 Ves. 279

760, 774 Yeatman v. Savings Institution, 95 - v. Barrow, 3 La. 67 - 304 U. S. 764

-0. Town of Roberts, 88 NI. 1 128 York & Maryland Line Railroad - v. Winchester, 7 Mart. N. 8. Co. v. Winans, 17 Ilow. 30 (La.) 22

443 | Young v. Harrison, 6 Ga. 130

48

REPORTS OF THE DECISIONS

OY THB

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES,

OCTOBER TERM, 1879.

NATIONAL BANK v. UNITED STATES.

1. Sect. 3413 of the Revised Statutes, which enacts that “every national banking

association, State bank, or banker, or association, shall pay a tax of ten per centum on the amount of notes of any town, city, or municipal corporation,

paid out by them," is not unconstitutional. 1 The tax thus laid is not on the notes, but on their use as a circulating medium. 3. Veazie Bank v. Fenno (8 Wall. 633) cited and approved.

ERROR to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

This is a suit by the United States to recover from the Merchants' National Bank of Little Rock, Ark., $160,000, being ten per cent on $1,600,000 of certain notes of the City of Little Rock, which it was alleged the bank had paid out during the years 1870, 1871, 1872, and 1873. The notes were issued and put in circulation by the city, and used in business and commercial transactions as money. They were printed on bank-note paper in amounts ranking from $1 to $100, and were payable to a person named or to bearer. By an ordinance of the city, and also by an act of the legislature of the State, they were receivable in payment of city taxes and of all dues to the city.

Sect. 3413 of the Revised Statutes is as follows: “Every national banking association, State bank, or banker, or assa

VOL. XI.

« AnteriorContinuar »