The Standard Procurement System (SPS): Can the DOD Procurement Process be Standardized? : Hearing Before the Subcommittee on National Security, Veterans Affairs, and International Relations of the Committee on Government Reform, House of Representatives, One Hundred Seventh Congress, Second Session, February 7, 2002
United States. Congress. House. Committee on Government Reform. Subcommittee on National Security, Veterans Affairs, and International Relations
U.S. Government Printing Office, 2003 - 90 páginas
Comentarios de la gente - Escribir un comentario
No encontramos ningún comentario en los lugares habituales.
Otras ediciones - Ver todas
Accounting achieve acquisition actions additional agencies audit believe benefits better billion budget Chairman commitments committee concerns CONGR CONGRESS THE LIBRARY continue contract contract management cost decisions Defense Procurement Department of Defense Department's deployed deployment determine directed Director economic analysis effort end users enhance ensure estimates example existing expected findings follows fully functionality future goals going GOVERNMENT implement important improve increase incremental information technology initiated investment issues justified LIBRARY OF CONGRESS LIEBERMAN look major measures meet ment milestone MYERS Office operational oversight percent performance plans positive problems program manager projects PUTNAM question RARY recognize recommendations releases replace requirements responsibility result risk schedule SPS program staff Standard Procurement System statement subcommittee testimony testing Thank understand users WILLEMSSEN
Página 51 - Mr. Chairman, this concludes my testimony. I would be happy to answer any questions you or other members of the subcommittee may have.
Página 30 - BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON NATIONAL SECURITY, VETERANS AFFAIRS AND INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS, HOUSE COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT REFORM ON THE STANDARD PROCUREMENT SYSTEM FEBRUARY 7, 2002 Mr.
Página 80 - Chairman, for the opportunity to appear before this committee. I will be pleased to answer any questions you may have.
Página 19 - Incremental investment management involves three fundamental components: (1) developing/acquiring a large system in a series of smaller projects or system increments; (2) individually justifying investment in each separate increment on the basis of costs, benefits, and risks; and (3) monitoring actual benefits achieved and costs incurred on ongoing increments and modifying subsequent increments/investments to reflect lessons learned.
Página 23 - Budget (OMB) guidance 11 emphasize the need to have investment management processes and information to help ensure that IT projects are being implemented at acceptable costs and within reasonable and expected time frames and that they are contributing to tangible, observable improvements in mission performance (ie, that projects are meeting the cost, schedule, and performance commitments upon which their approval was justified). For programs such as SPS, DOD requires this cost, schedule, and performance...
Página 52 - THE US HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT REFORM SUBCOMMITTEE ON NATIONAL SECURITY, VETERANS AFFAIRS, AND INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS FEBRUARY 7, 2002 Mr.