Safe, Legal, and Unavailable? Abortion Politics in the United States
SAGE Publications, 2007 - 235 páginas
The Supreme Court’s 1973 decision in Roe v. Wade legalized abortion. Yet while the medical procedure is legal—and safe—many women across the country do not have the ability to exercise this reproductive right. Melody Rose examines abortion as a social regulatory policy, thoughtfully and thoroughly chronicling the erosion of abortion rights and availability since Roe. Paying respect to all views of this controversial topic in her engaging new book, Rose explores the success of the right-to-life movement in accumulating local and national policies that restrict access to abortion while enhancing fetal protections. In addition to a basic and brief primer on the practice and history of abortion, Rose considers the roles played by the courts, political parties, and interest groups in constructing barriers to abortion. With an examination of public opinion poll data and a look at both state and national statutory prohibitions on abortion, Rose also shows how powerful language wars have resulted in material policy alterations. Chapter-opening vignettes and vivid storytelling make this brief and topical supplement a good read that is sure to get your students thinking critically about this highly charged topic. As well, the author has augmented chapters with further reading suggestions and provocative discussion questions that invite insightful discussion and analysis.
Resultados 1-3 de 45
Both the majority opinion , penned by Justice Blackmun , and the concurrence
written by Justice John Paul Stevens argued that the state ' s restrictions
threatened contemporary understanding of the proper scope of government
dissenting opinions in those two cases reveals a reiteration of the arguments that
gained the majority in the funding cases and foreshadowed what would become
the majority view in Webster v . Reproductive Health Services ( 1989 ) and later ...
William Rehnquist , chief justice at the time of the ruling , wrote the majority
opinion in Webster , and changed the framing of abortion adjudication in
important ways . Rehnquist ' s central tenet was that the state ( in this case ,
Missouri ) has no ...
Comentarios de la gente - Escribir un comentario
Just the Facts
Abortion on Demand? The Supreme Court
Derechos de autor
Otras 8 secciones no mostradas