Safe, Legal, and Unavailable? Abortion Politics in the United StatesSAGE Publications, 2007 - 235 páginas The Supreme Court’s 1973 decision in Roe v. Wade legalized abortion. Yet while the medical procedure is legal—and safe—many women across the country do not have the ability to exercise this reproductive right. Melody Rose examines abortion as a social regulatory policy, thoughtfully and thoroughly chronicling the erosion of abortion rights and availability since Roe. Paying respect to all views of this controversial topic in her engaging new book, Rose explores the success of the right-to-life movement in accumulating local and national policies that restrict access to abortion while enhancing fetal protections. In addition to a basic and brief primer on the practice and history of abortion, Rose considers the roles played by the courts, political parties, and interest groups in constructing barriers to abortion. With an examination of public opinion poll data and a look at both state and national statutory prohibitions on abortion, Rose also shows how powerful language wars have resulted in material policy alterations. Chapter-opening vignettes and vivid storytelling make this brief and topical supplement a good read that is sure to get your students thinking critically about this highly charged topic. As well, the author has augmented chapters with further reading suggestions and provocative discussion questions that invite insightful discussion and analysis. |
Dentro del libro
Resultados 1-3 de 44
... majority is clear to point out that " the right of personal privacy includes the abortion decision , but that this right is not unqualified , and must be considered against important state interests in regulation . " 21 Compared to the ...
... majority in the funding cases and foreshadowed what would become the majority view in Webster v . Reproductive Health Services ( 1989 ) and later Planned Parenthood of Southeastern P.A. v . Casey ( 1992 ) . O'Connor's dissent in Akron ...
... majority opinion in Webster , and changed the framing of abortion adjudication in impor- tant ways . Rehnquist's central tenet was that the state ( in this case , Missouri ) has no obligation to provide public facilities for abortion ...
Contenido
Just the Facts | 30 |
Conclusion | 50 |
Abortion on Demand? The Supreme Court | 57 |
Derechos de autor | |
Otras 8 secciones no mostradas
Otras ediciones - Ver todas
Safe, Legal, and Unavailable? Abortion Politics in the United States Melody Rose Vista de fragmentos - 2007 |