v. Delamore, 114 U. S. 501, 29 L. ed. 244; but not a judgment or decree which erroneously gave too great effect to a discharge, Linton v. Stanton, 12 How. 423, 13 L. ed. 1050; nor a refusal to open a decree so as to allow a defendant to plead a discharge. Wolf v. Stix, 96 U. S. 541, 24 L. ed. 640. But see Winchester v. Heiskell, 119 U. S. 450, 30 L. ed. 462. See also Van Norden v. Benner, 131 U. S. cxlv, 24 L. ed. 247; Scott v. Kelly,

22 Wall. 57, 22 L. ed. 729; Boatmen's Sav. Bank v. State Sav. Ass'n, 114 U. S. 265, 29 L. ed. 174. Under the act of 1867 it was held that the Supreme Court might review in certain cases the decision of a State court against an assignee in bankruptcy who claimed title to certain property. Williams Heard, 140 U. S. 529, 35 L. ed. 550. But see McKenna v. Simpson, 129 U. S. 506, 32 L. ed. 771.

V.