Imágenes de páginas
PDF
EPUB

pointing out the mischievous confequences of such a fond conceit.

For the doctrine of the Trinity, Mr. Tucker wifely refers us, not to the fcriptures, but to the creeds appointed to be read in our churches. According to his explanation, the Trinity is God acting in three characters. But left we fhould be thought to have mifrepresented his fenfe, we will give it at length, in his Own words :

Divines, fays he, tell us that God created the matter, and gave the form of this vifible nature we behold: thus much we knew before. But they tell us likewife, that he has interpofed many times fince by miracles, prophecies, and revelations, that he united himself to one particular man, fo as to become the fame person with him from his birth, that he frequently cooperates with our endeavours to difcover truths, and perform good works we could not have done without fuch aid, that thefe operations were performed by three perfons in one God, not jointly, but each having a diftinct fhare of them: the union with manhood, and all done in virtue of that union, was the work of the Son; the affiftance afforded occafionally to men in general was the province of the Holy Spirit, and all the rest of the Father.

By these diftinct manners of operation God appears to act in three characters, easily separable from one another in our conception, but joining mutually in advancement of the general defign, and executing the principal ftrokes in the plan of providence refpecting the moral world. The Father acted in the character of King or Governor, controuling the courses of nature and actions of fecond caufes by immediate exertions of his pow, and by his figns and wonders prepared the minds of men for reception of the benefits imparted from the other two. The Son acted in the character of a co-agent or partner, not controuling the mental or bodily powers of Jefus, but adding a force and vigour which could not have been furnished by natural caufes; fupplied what had been left deficient in the plan of providence, and rendered mankind capable of reaping advantage from the effufions of the Holy Spirit. This laft acts in the character of a friend and monitor, not working with the power and majesty of a monarch, nor dwelling, infeparably, with the mind of man, but imperceptibly throwing in affiftance from time to time, as wanted, and thereby filling up the laft lines in the divine plan.'

In a fubfequent paragraph Mr. Tucker, having obferved that no two fubftances, how clofely foever placed, or in what manner foever joined, can become one, and therefore that to fay that God and man united made one perfon, in the modern philofophical fenfe of the word, is as flat a contradiction as that

Ff 4

number

number two is number one, proceeds to illustrate the hypoftatic union, by confidering the manner in which our foul and body are one, viz. not by converfion of fpirit into body, but by taking body into a participation of functions with spirit: not by confufion of fubftance, but by unity of perfon.'

Let us now,' fays he, apply this to the hypoftatic union, wherein though we muft understand perfonality in another sense, as importing character inftead of numerical identity, yet the manner of union will remain the fame: for the character of moral wisdom, innocence, and force to refift all pain, terror, and other temptations, belonged folely to the Deity; no human foul could act up to it; until the manhood being taken into God, that is, God being pleafed perpetually to supply what was wanting in human nature, Jefus was united to the Son, which together became one Chrift; whofe whole conduct was of a piece throughout, running in one conftant tenour and character, and his actions were thofe of the united agency. all the acts of Jefus were acts of the Son, and the Son performed nothing but by the inftrumentality of Jefus ; as the fpirit of a man performs nothing but by the inftrumentality of his bodily powers.'

For

The defign and effect of this union between God and man were, according to Mr. Tucker, the redemption of mankind. Upon this fubject he has advanced fome new and very fingular ideas. The trial to which Adam was put in the garden, was an affay made upon him, in order to manifeft what human nature is, and proved a condemnation of the whole race, by fhewing that a man placed in the most favourable fituation of circumftances poffible, would yet be overcome by the first temptation affailing him. Thus we bring into the world with us an original fin, by which I do not understand an actual guilt, but a certain propenfity to contract it upon occafion offered and fo are born children of perdition, not as involved in it already, but because fallen into a road that will lead inevitably thereinto.'

The redemption of mankind is their deliverance from this ftate of moral imbecillity and frailty, and is effected by the perfect example of moral rectitude amidst the most trying circumftances, which Jefus, by virtue of his union with the Deity, was enabled to exhibit. The office performed by God in his fecond perfona or character of the Son, was to invigorate the human foul of Jefus, that his understanding might never be overpowered by appetite, or paffion, or any impulfe of imagination whatever, but conftantly have the determination of his will in every fingle inftance; being fupplied perpetually by the Divine Agency with what was wanting to the natural ftrength of man.' And the manner in which the fufferings of the Redeemer

4

deemer operated to our benefit-I apprehend to have been, not by taking off any fervice we were deftined to perform for the univerfe, for this would be facrificing the general interest to the advantage of a few; nor by working a change in the conftitution of human nature, for this would look like fomething of a charm and magic; nor yet by turning the purposes of God from refentment into mercy, for this would be to represent him liable to paffion and mutability: but by fetting an example which might lead us into the method of performing the hardest of our fervices with the fame tranquillity and fatisfaction of mind that he did.-The imitation then of our grand Exemplar is the one thing needful for our deliverance, which must be worked out by stamping upon our minds that character of moral wisdom which fecured him continually against the approach of evil and mifery: and until we can compafs that, our redemption remains incomplete.

[ocr errors]

From hence we may fee the imputation of righteousness, the mediation and interceffion for finners ftill continuing fuch, are only figurative expreffions, to denote that we derive our righteousness from Chrift, and are enabled by the medium of his example and aids, to fulfil the laws of nature, which were impracticable to us before.'

The influence and effect of the example of Chrift, that is, the redemption of mankind, according to our Author, probably took place in part among the inhabitants of the vehicular regions, during the time that our Lord was in Hades; is gradually taking place in this world among his difciples; and will be completed in the future ftate, with refpect to all men, without exception.

This is the fcheme of redemption which Mr. Tucker has given as the genuine fenfe of fcripture, and doctrine of the Church. We believe that few of his readers will think it to be either the one, or the other. From the whole of what he has advanced on the three fubjects, it appears to have been his opinion, that the only way to reconcile the Articles of the Church of England to common-fenfe and reafon, was to explain away their meaning, or to put an unnatural and arbitrary conftruction upon them; and that the literal fenfe of the Articles, and the fentiments which the compilers intended to convey and establish, are the fentiments of the vulgar, the language of the nursery, &c. The philofopher, the rationalist, ftrikes out a scheme, according to his views of Nature and Providence, and then takes it for granted that this is the scheme, which the established religion of his country, whatever it be, virtually includes and authenticates. To whom can such reprefentations and reafonings with refpect to the established fyftem of this country be acceptable or useful? They who fondly receive

receive and zealously maintain the natural and obvious meaning of the Thirty-nine Articles will reject them with abhorrence. The rational Diffenter will be of opinion, that those unfcriptural terms and phrafes, under which fuch tenets have been conveyed, as have obfcured and debased the Chriftian religion, ought to be exploded along with the tenets themselves. The only perfons to whom we can fuppofe them to be agreeable, are thofe among the established clergy, who have too much good fenfe to believe the Articles in their literal and obvious meaning, and too little virtuous refolution to give up the emoluments annexed to conformity.

[ocr errors]

Mr. Tucker next proceeds to confider the theological virtues,- Faith-Hope-and Charity: upon each of which his acquaintance with human nature, and juft and liberal views of the connexion of interefts throughout the universe, enable him to advance many judicious and ftriking reflections, while his attachment to other parts of his fyftem, and the warmth of his imagination, lead him to advance fome things which are not fo well grounded, and which difcover a lively fancy, rather than a folid judgment. He rightly obferves that Faith, confidered as a virtue, or principle of right action, is not a mere affent of the mind to fome propofition, but an habitual uninterrupted perfuafion of truths that have been manifefted fuch to our understanding. For when an important article is become a judgment of the mind, appearing there as a felf-evident truth, rifing fpontaneoufly with a strong unreferved affent, without waiting for reflection to evince it; then and not till then it will operate as a practical principle of action, and have its weight in determining our minuteft motions; but nothing that is not practical can be useful or a virtue, nor placed to the credit fide of our account.' But we think that he misreprefents the nature of the argumentum ad hominem, and carries it to a pernicious extreme, when he fays, Schoolmen allow, and divines fometimes employ what they call arguments to the man, when they ufe fuch as they think will weigh with the hearer, although having no credit with themfelves; but then the conclufion they would prove to him thereby, ought to be a real truth in their own judgment, or they act difhoneftly. In like manner, if you will bring a man into a perfuafion you judge in your own mind to be juft and beneficial to him, you may lawfully put in ufe other perfuafions leading thereinto which you do not hold yourfelf, provided you cannot effect your honeft purpofe upon him by rational conviction: for in this cafe the end fan&ifies the means.'

[ocr errors]

What unlimited fcope would this principle give to diffimulation! To point out to perfons the confequences of their own views of things, and to urge them to act agreeably to them, is

one

one thing to give them reafon to think that we have the same 'views when we have not, is widely different. The one is confiftent with fincerity and benevolence: the other is a mifchievous and criminal diffimulation; it has a tendency to beget an indifference to truth in ourselves, and to destroy the foundation of that confidence in each other which is the cement and grace of fociety. For fome other reprehenfible principles, and many judicious obfervations on this fubject, and on that of Hope, we must refer our Readers to the work itself.

[ocr errors]

Charity he justly confiders as equivalent to univerfal benevolence, extending in with and difpofition, like the bounty of heaven, to all created beings, without refpect of perfons, but confined in its exercises by the fcantinefs of our powers to the degrees of neighbourhood wherein they refpectively are fituated.' But we think that he injures and degrades this noble difpofition, when he reprefents it as founded in felf-intereft. In our opinion, the focial and benevolent affections are equally a part of the human conftitution with the felfifh. In wifhing well and doing good to others, we do indeed follow and gratify a naturalinclination, but without any regard to the advantage that mayrefult to us from our defire or endeavour to communicate pleafure, or to increase the quantity of happiness in the world. The connexion of interefts throughout the univerfe, or that there is one general fund of bounty and happiness, wherein we all are partners,' and that by adding to the common stock we increase our own fhare in it, are confiderations which may ftrengthen and enlarge the principle of benevolence in some philofophic minds, but cannot be supposed to have any influence in difpofing and exciting the bulk of mankind to amiable and generous actions. Indeed it is a question whether Mr. Tucker could have found fix perfons among all his acquaintance, who entertained the fame or fimilar ideas of this matter with himself. In the course of the chapter he has advanced feveral peculiar notions on this subject, taken from the hypothefis of the mundane foul, and from his mistaken opinions refpecting the confequences of the Divine equity, which we noticed in our review of the former parts of the work *.

The fifth volume clofes with a fupplemental chapter entitled, Our Neighbour, containing remarks on the parable of the good. Samaritan, and on the unjuft cavil that has been raised againft the gofpel-because it has omitted to give any precepts upon Friendship.'

The first chapter of the fixth volume is that to which we before referred +, entitled, Divine Oeconomy, in which our Author

* See Review, vol. xlii. p. II.

+ See p. 429. endeavours

« AnteriorContinuar »