« AnteriorContinuar »
not meet with the least resistance, the slaughter was prodigious. The vain confidence of the Sabines was, obviously, the principal cause of their ruin. While one part thought the other was safe, they did not stand upon their defence; those in the camp ran toward the corps placed in amk buscade, while they in their turn endeavoured to regain the camp. Thus they fell in with each other in great disorder, and in mutual want of that assistance, which neither was able to give. The Sabines would have been entirely cut off, had not the city of Fidenæ been so near, which proved an asylum to some, particularly to those that fled when the camp was taken. Such, as did not take refuge there, were either destroyed or taken prisoners.
The. Romans, though accustomed to ascribe every great event to the interposition of the gods, gave the credit of this victory solely to the general; and the first thing the soldiers were heard to say was, thát Publicola had put the enemy into their hands, lame, blind, and almost bound for the slaughter. The people were enriched with the plunder, and the sale of prisoners. As for Publicola, he was honoured with a triumph, and having surrendered the administration to the succeeding consuls, died soon afterward; thus finishing his life in circumstances esteemed the happiest and most glorious, that man can attain 72 The people, as it
5. He was the most virtuous citizen, one of the greatest gene. rals, and the most popular consul Rome ever had. As he had taken more care to transmit his virtues to his posterity, than to enrich them; and as notwithstanding the frugaliiy of his life, and the high offices which he had borne, there was not found money enough in his house to defray the charges of his funeral, he was buried at the expence of the pablic. His poverty is a circumstance, which Plutarch should have mentioned, because a funeral at the public charge was an honour sometimes paid to the rich. (L.) It is not overlooked by Livy and Dion. Halic. The amount of
they had done nothing to tequite his merit whis life-timens decreed that his funeral shoula be solemnised at the public charge, and, to make it the more honourable, every one contributed a piece of money called Quadrans.eul The women likewise, out of particular regard to his memory, continued the mourning for him a whole year. His body also, by an order of the citizens, was interred within the city 73, near the place called Velia, and all his family were to have a burying-place there. At present, indeed, none of his progeny are interred in that ground: the attendants only carry thither the corpse, and set it down; when one of them puts a lighted torch under it, which he immediately takes back again. Thus they claim by that aét the right, but wave the privilege, for the body is taken away, and interred without the walls.2019T மாக மாற SS Id Is ital still gatnigit E9icena zid aliule goyol 1991s slopildo I 289190w yd nisla 9d of sit egunstemati9 1919 sdi doms) HYDOTS SOLON AND PUBLICOLA (meds alqin 19116 let benog 25 opbrog aid
Win 19410 41919 bas
ļua ban nolos donde 1. THERE is something singular in this paralel, and what has not occurred to us in any other af the Lives which we have written, that. Publicola
the contribution, in that age of poverty, must have been considerable: but. Sallust has told us, that they were is suppliciis deorum magnifici, domi parci.' (Bell. Catil. ix.).*
75. This was, at first, the general practices but in after times the Twelve Tables prohibiting it's continuance, the dead were interred by the side of the public ways, and the distinction of being buried within the walls was reserved (as in Greece) for those, who bad senderod eminent services to the commonwealthuis Dion. Halia. says, it was exclusively bestowed upon Publicola s but Plutarch elsewhere states that Fabricids enjoyed the same privilege, as did all (according to Pyrrho of Lipara who had attained the honour of a triumpbaz-The claim asserted
by Publicola's descendeats, is not mentioned either by Livy or Dion. Halic.*-10][cenu i noiva
should exemplify the maxims of Solon, and that Solon should
proclaim beforehand the happiness of Publicola. For the definition of happiness, which
Solon gave Cresus, is more applicable to Publicola than to Tellus. It is true, he pronounces Tellus happy on account of his virtue, his valuable children, and his glorious death; yet he does not mention him in his poems as particularly distinguished by his virtue, his children, or his employments. But
Publicola, in his life-time, attained the highest reputation and authority among Romans, by means of his virtues; and, after his death, his family, was reckoned among the most illustrious: the houses of the Publicolæ, the Messalæ, and Valerii", nent for the space of six hundred years
5, still acknowledging him as the fountain of their bongur. Tellus like, a braver man, keeping his post and fighting to the last, fell by the enemy's hand; whereas Publicola, after having slain his enemies (a much happier circumstance, than to be slain by them) after seeing his country victorious through his conduct as consul and as general, after triumphs and every other mark of honour, died that death, which Solon had so passionately coveted, and declared so happy.sl. Salon again in his
answer to Mimnermusiconcerning the period 2of human life, thus exclaims: esistiti sved gw ordy 29111 9ds
- 109 119 Pet friendship's faithful heart attend my bierjuduinoo stis etaqw Heave the sad sigh, and drop the pitying teapt! :s/da19bie.
: 15, ๆ ชามos And Publicola had this felieity. For he was lamented,
hot. hermo 190 TO 10 bod odw9003163
25W &'V 9d9 with That is the other Valerii, vit. the Maximize the Corvini, stre Poriti, the Lavini, and the Flaccia >*120'929 * : c'? hit. It appears, from this passage, that Plutarchi wrote the Life of Publicola about the beginning of Trajan's reign.us gnibos lle
Cicerde (Tasc. i.49., and de Senect.20.) thought this wish of Solon's unsuitable to so, wise a man, and preferred to it that ofiche poet Ennius, who pleasing himself with the thought of an im
by the whole city; thousands attended his funera with tears, with regret, with the deepest sorrow; and the Roman matrons mourned for him, as for the loss of a son, a brother, or a common parent.
Another wish of Solon's is thus expressed :
The flow of riches I desire,
And Publicola not only acquired, but employed his riches honourably, for he was a generous benefactor to the poor: so that, if Solon was the wisest, Publicola was the happiest of human kind. What the former had wished for, as the greatest and most desirable of blessings, the latter actually possessed and continued to enjoy.
Thus Solon did honour to Publicola, and he to Solon in his turn. For he considered him as the most excellent pattern, that could be proposed, in regulating a democracy; and like him, laying aside the pride of power, he rendered it gentle and acceptable to all. He also made use of several of Solon's laws; for he empowered the people to elect their own magistrates, and left an appeal to them from the sentence of other courts, as the Athenian
mortality upon earth as a poet, desired to die unlamented. Cicero rejoiced in the same prospect, as an orator. The passion for immortality is, indeed, a natural one; but as the chief part of our happiness consists in the exercise of the benevolent affections, in giving and receiving sincere testimonies of regard, the undoubted expressions of that regard must sooth the pains of a dying man, and comfort him with the reflection that he has not been wanting in the offices of humanity. (L.).
Mimnermus, the inventor of the pentaméter verse (Athen. xiii. 8.) was a poet and musician of Colophon, and distinguished chiefly by his Elegies, of which only a few fragments are extant. Horace, who sets him abore Callimachus (Ep. II. . 101.) represents him as placing all his happiness in amore jocisque (Ep. I. ï. 65.); so that, whatever poetry may have suffered by the loss of his works, morality has probably been a gainer by it.*
Sawgiver had done. He did not indeed, with Solon, create a new senate?; but he almost doubled the number of that, which he found in being.
His reason for appointing quæstors or treasurers was that, if the consul were a worthy man, he might have, leisure to attend to more important affairs; if unworthy, that he might not have greater opportunities of injustice, when both the government and the treasury were under his direction,
Publicola's aversion from tyrants was stronger than that of Solon. For the latter made every attempt to establish arbitrary power punishable by law; but the former made it death, without the formality of trial. Solon, indeed, justly and reasonably plumes himself upon having refused absolute power, when both the state of affairs and the in: clinations of the people would have readily admitted it: and yet it was no less glorious for Publicola, that finding the consular authority too despotic, he rendered it milder and more popular, and did not stretch it so far as he might have done. That this was the best method of governing, Solon seems before him to have discovered, when he says of a republic,
The reins nor loosely held nor strictly tied,
Safely the car of slippery power you guide. But the annulling of debts was peculiar to Solon,
77 By Bonn, we apprehend that Plutarch here rather means the senate or council of Four Hundred, than the council of Areopagus. The Four Hundred had the pre-cognisance of all that was to come before the people, and nothing could be proposed to the general assembly, till digested by themselves; so that, as far as he was able, he provided against a thirst of arbitrary power in the rich, and a desire of licentious freedom in the lower orders; the Areopagus being a check upon the former, as the 'senate was a curb upon the latter. (L.) M. Ricard' understands this passage of the Areopagus. * VOL. I.