ANNEX E

LIST OF TERRITORIES COVERED BY PREFERENTIAL ARRANGEMENTS
BETWEEN CHILE AND NEIGHBOURING COUNTRIES
REFERRED TO IN PARAGRAPH 2 (d) OF ARTICLE I

Preferences in force exclusively between Chile, on the

one hand, and

1. Argentina

2. Bolivia

3. Peru

on the other hand.

79125 0-48-vol. 1

ANNEX F

LIST OF TERRITORIES COVERED BY PREFERENTIAL ARRANGEMENTS BETWEEN LEBANON AND SYRIA AND NEIGHBOURING COUNTRIES REFERRED TO IN PARAGRAPH 2 (1) OF ARTICLE I

Preferences in force exclusively between the Lebano

Syrian Customs Union, on the one hand, and

1. Palestine

2. Transjordan

on the other hand.

ANNEX H

PERCENTAGE SHARES OF TOTAL EXTERNAL TRADE TO BE USED FOR THE PURPOSE OF MAKING THE DETERMINATION REFERRED TO IN ARTICLE XXVI

(based on the average of 1938 and the latest twelve months for which figures are available)

Note: These percentages have been determined taking into account the trade of all territories for which countries mentioned above have international responsibility and which are not self-governing in matters dealt with in the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade.

X The allocation of this percentage will be made by agreement between the governments of India and Pakistan and will be communicated as soon as possible to the Secretary-General of the United Nations.

ANNEX I

INTERPRETATIVE NOTES

ad Article I

Paragraph 1

The obligations incorporated in paragraph 1 of Article I by reference to paragraphs 1 and 2 of Article III and those incorporated in paragraph 2 (b) of Article II by reference to Article VI shall be considered as falling within Part II for the purposes of the Protocol of Provisional Application.

Paragraph 3

The term "margin of preference" means the absolute difference between the most-favoured-nation rate of duty and the preferential rate of duty for the like product, and not the proportionate relation between those rates. As examples:

1.) If the most-favoured-nation rate were 36 per cent

ad valorem and the preferential rate were 24 per cent ad valorem, the margin of preference would be 12 per cent ad valorem, and not one-third of the mostfavoured-nation rate;

2.) If the most-favoured-nation rate were 36 per cent ad
valorem and the preferential rate were expressed as
two-thirds of the most-favoured-nation rate, the
margin of preference would be 12 per cent ad valorem;

3.) If the most-favoured-nation rate were 2 francs per
kilogram and the preferential rate were 1.50 francs
per kilogram, the margin of preference would be
0.50 francs per kilogram.

The following kinds of customs action, taken in accordance with established uniform procedures, would not be contrary to a general binding of margins of preference:

(1)

the re-application to an imported product of a tariff
classification or rate of duty, properly applicable
to such product, in cases in which the application
of such classification or rate to such product was
temporarily suspended or inoperative on April 10,
1947; and

(11) the classification of a particular product under a
tariff item other than that under which importations
of that product were classified on April 10, 1947,
in cases in which the tariff law clearly contemplates
that such product may be classified under more than
one tariff item.