This power to regulate is not a power to destroy, and limitation is not the equivalent of confiscation. Under pretence of regulating fares and freights, the state cannot require a railroad corporation to carry persons or property without reward : neither... Cases Determined in the Supreme Court of Washington - Página 526por Washington (State). Supreme Court, Arthur Remington, Solon Dickerson Williams - 1921Vista completa - Acerca de este libro
| Massachusetts - 1894 - 950 páginas
...reasonable rates. See Pennsylvania Railroad v. Miller, 132 US 75. It was also said that '4 Under pretence of regulating fares and freights, the State cannot require a railroad corporation to carry persons and property without reward ; neither can it do that which in law amounts to a taking of private property... | |
| 1890 - 548 páginas
...said, it is not to be inferred that this power of limiiation or regulation is itself withont limit. This power to regulate is not a power to destroy,...railroad corporation to carry persons or property withont reward ; neither can it do that which in law amonnts to a taking of private property for public... | |
| 1902 - 988 páginas
...decisions of this court in which it has been held that, under pretense of regulating fares and freights, a any other corporation, partnership, individual, or...commodity, or shall enter into, become a member of, or part da* process of law; that the question of the reasonableness of a rate of charge for transportation... | |
| 1899 - 986 páginas
...amounts to a regulation of foreign or interstate commerce, such power Is not without limit; and that, "under pretense of regulating fares and freights,...reward, neither can It do that which In law amounts to the taking of private property for public use without just compensation, or without due process of... | |
| 1897 - 1036 páginas
...that "it is not to be Inferred that this power of limitation or regulation is Itself without limit This power to regulate Is not a power to destroy, and limitation Is not the équivalent of confiscation. Under the pretense of regulating fares and freights, the state cannot... | |
| United States. Supreme Court - 1897 - 790 páginas
...that " it is not to be inferred that this power of limitation or regulation is itself without limit. This power to regulate is not a power to destroy ;...limitation is not the equivalent of confiscation. Under the pretence of regulating fares and freights, the State cannot require a railroad to carry persons... | |
| 1894 - 1172 páginas
...reasonable rates. See Railroad Co. v. Miller, 132 US 75, 10 Sup. Ct. Rep. 34. It was also said that, "under pretense of regulating fares and freights,...cannot require a railroad corporation to carry persons and property without reward; neither can it do that which In the law amounts to a taking of private... | |
| Chicago and Alton Railroad Company - 1886 - 470 páginas
...said, it must not be inferred that this power of "limitation or regulation is itself without limit. This power to regulate is "not a power to destroy,...pretense of regulating fares and freights, the State can not "require a railroad corporation to carry persons or property without reward; "neither can it... | |
| John Norton Pomeroy - 1886 - 800 páginas
...said, it is not to be inferred that this power of limitation or regulation is itself without limit. This power to regulate is not a power to destroy,...limitation is not the equivalent of confiscation. Under pretence of regulating fares and freights, the state cannot require a railroad corporation to carry... | |
| |