The Political Question Doctrine and the Supreme Court of the United States
The application of the Political Question Doctrine is at a crucial crossroads as the Supreme Court continues to test new "War on Terrorism" initiatives. Historically, the political question doctrine has held the courts from resolving constitutional issues that are better left to other departments of government, as a way of maintaining the system of checks and balances. However, the doctrine's many ambiguities have allowed a roughly defined juxtaposition of the branches of government during previous years when the Republic was concerned with both international matters and those within its continental confines. The Political Question Doctrine and the Supreme Court of the United States discusses the gradual changes in the parameters of the doctrine, including its current position dealing with increasingly extraterritorial concerns. Nada Mourtada-Sabbah and Bruce E. Cain bring together critical essays that examine the broad issues of judicial involvement in politics and the future of the doctrine. With a wide range of historical and theoretical perspectives, this book will stimulate debate among those interested in political science and legal studies.
Comentarios de la gente - Escribir un comentario
No encontramos ningún comentario en los lugares habituales.
The Rise and Fall of the Political Question Doctrine
Law and Prudence in the Law of Justiciability The Transformation and Disappearance of the Political Question Doctrine
Leaving the Empty Vessel of Republicanism Unfilled An Argument for the Continued Nonjusticiability of Guarantee Clause Cases
Two Centuries of Changing Political Questions in Cultural Context
A Political Question By Any Other Name Government Strategy in the Enemy Combatant Cases of Hamdi and Padilla
Political Questions in France
Who Should Be the Authoritative Interpreter of the Constitution? Why There Should Not Be a Political Question Doctrine
Bush v Gore Too Political?
Political Questions and Political Cases The Evolving Justifications for Judicial Involvement in Politics
Termination of the ABM Treaty and the Political Question Doctrine Judicial Succor for Presidential Power
Political Questions and Political Remedies
About the Authors
Otras ediciones - Ver todas
action Amendment American appeared apply argued argument authority Baker Bush Carr challenge Chief Circuit citizens claim clear committed concern concluded Congress congressional constitutional constitutionally constraints counted decide decision deference Department detention determine discretion district election electoral process enemy combatant enforcement Equal Protection Erwin Chemerinsky established example executive exercise express fact federal final Florida Supreme forces foreign Gore Guarantee Clause Hamdi held House individual initiative institution interests interpretation involved issue Judge judgment judicial review judiciary Justice lack legislative legislature limited majority matter meaning merits military nature noted opinion Padilla particular parties person plaintiffs political branches political question doctrine presented president presidential Press principle problem provides prudential reasons resolve respect responsibility result role rule Second Senate standards standing suggested Supreme Court termination tion treaty United University violated vote voters