TABLE OF THE CASES CITED IN THIS VOLUME Barb. 396.. Baltimore, etc., R. R. Co. v. Johnson, 84 Ind. 420.. Baltimore, etc., R. R. Co. v. Walborn, 127 Ind. 142.. Barber, etc., Co. v. Edgerton, 125 Ind. 455... Abdil v. Abdil, 33 Ind. 460. .84, 386 | Baldwin v. City of Buffalo, 29 .554 383 .260 .141 515 Barrett v. Bamber, 9 Phila. 202.493 323 .388 22 Bass Foundry, etc., v. Board, etc., 22 .461 Allen v. Davis, 99 Ind. 216. 115 Ind. 234.. 244 Battle v. Davis, 66 N. C. 252. .224 Bayles v. Wallace, 56 Hun, 428.249 Bayless v. Glenn, 72 Ind. 5.. 294 Bearss v. Montgomery, 46 Ind. 544.. Beauchamp v. State, 6 Blackf. 299. Bedford, etc., R. R. Co. v. Rain- Beer Co. v. Massachusetts, 97 U. 515 19 465 566 141, 521 161 Begien v. Freeman, 75 Ind. 398.515 .489 72 Black v. Thompson, 107 Ind.162. 76 57 Board, etc., v. Fullen,111 Ind.410.239 | Buchanan v. Milligan, 108 Ind. 433... 227 Board, etc., v. Senn, 117 Ind.410.234, 498 Board, etc., v. Shipley,77 Ind.553.246 534.. .303 Boaz v. McChesney, 53 Ind. 193.364 Bohler v. Tappan, 1 McCrary, .581 .485 54 194 134.. 149 Boling v. Howell, 93 Ind. 329.85, 188 Bolton v. Miller, 6 Ind. 262.....485 Boor v. Lowrey, 103 Ind. 468. 421 Booth v. Cottingham, 126 Ind.431.260 Bouvey v. McNeal, 126 Ind. 541. 22 Bowles v. State, 37 Ohio St. 35. 70 Bowman v. Chicago, etc., R. W. Co., 125 U. S. 465.. Boyd v. Byrd, 8 Blackf, 113. Brackett v. Norton, 4 Conn.517..260 Braden v. Graves, 85 Ind. 92. Bradley v. State, 31 Ind. 492. Bradshaw v. Warner, 54 Ind. 58.369 Brenner v. Quick, 88 Ind. 546...212 Brickell v. New York, etc., R. R. Co., 120 N. Y. 290. .100 Bright v. McCullough,27 Ind.223. 69 Brimmer v. Rebman,138 U. S.78.582, 590 Briscoe v. Johnson, 73 Ind. 573. .104 Brock v. Harris, 11 How. 204... 259 Brosemer v. Kelsey, 106 Ind.504.307 Brower v. O'Brien, 2 Ind. 423.. 17 Brown v. Caldwell, 23 W.Va.187. Brown v. Cody, 115 Ind. 484.. Brown v. Forst, 95 Ind. 248.. Brown v. Herron, 59 Ind. 61 Brown v. Houston, 114 U.S.622..581 Brown v. Maher, 68 Ind. 14. .230 Brown v. Owen, 94 Ind. 31. .173, 470 Brown v. Piper, 91 U. S. 37. .574 Brown v. Rawlings, 72 Ind. 505. 329 Brown v. Russell & Co., 105 Ind. 46. Brown v. State, 105 Ind. 385. Brown v. Will, 103 Ind. 71.. 22 Browning v. Board,etc.,44 Ind.11.301 Brownlee v. Kenneipp, 41 Ind. 216... 47 393 .364 .316 .323 .195 .465 72 370 163 Bufkin v. Boyce, 104 Ind. 53. .373 .256 42 54 537 .196 .466 .104 .104 353. Carithers v. Stuart, 87 Ind. 424. Carmichael v. Adams, 91 Ind.526.323 Carother's Appeal, 118 Pa. St.468.586 Carr v. Hays, 110 Ind. 408. Carr v. State, 23 Neb. 749. Carter v. Ford Plate Glass Co., 85 Ind. 180.. Carver v. Lewis, 104 Ind. 438. Carver v. Lewis, 105 Ind. 44. Case v. Wrestler, 4 Ohio St. 561..227 Cassady v. Magher, 85 Ind.228. .292 Catalani v. Catalani,124 Ind.54.. 49 Cate v. Cranor, 30 Ind. 292.. .446 Catlett v. Trustees, etc., 62 Ind. 365.. .416 Challiss v. Parker, 11 Kan. 394. 72 Chamberlain v. Reid, 49 Ind.332.465 Chambers v. Butcher, 82 Ind. 508.419 Chicago v. Sheldon,9 Wallace,50.529 Chicago, etc., R. R. Co. v. Boggs, 101 Ind. 522. Chicago, etc., R. R. Co. v. Hedges, 105 Ind. 398.. Chicago, etc., R. R. Co. v. Holdridge, 118 Ind. 281.. 352 Chicago, etc., R. W. Co. v. Hedges, 118 Ind. 5.. 100, 141 Chicago, etc., R. W. Co. v. Jones, 103 Ind. 386. Chy Lung v. Freeman,92 U.S.275.581 Cincinnati, etc., R. R. Co. v. Butler, 103 Ind. 31 100, 141, 521 Cincinnati, etc., R. R. Co. v. MeMullen, 117 Ind. 439. .551 521 215 203 City of Valparaiso v. Gardner, 161 Cooley v. Board, etc., 12 How.299.579 Cooley v. Port Wardens of Philadelphia, 12 How. 299... 573 421 Coon v. Vaughn, 64 Ind. 89.. 564 466 93 116 76 De Priest v. State, 68 Ind. 569. Devol v. Dye, 123 Ind. 321.. Devor v. Rerick, 87 Ind. 337. Dewey v. State, ex rel.,91 Ind. 173 De Witt v. Smith, 63 Mo. 263.... 63 Directors, etc., v. Jackson, 3 App. Cases H. L. 193.. District of Columbia v. Washington, etc., R. R. Co., 4 Am. & Eng. R. R Cases, 161.. Diven v. Johnson, 117 Ind. 512..537 Dixon v. Duke, 85 Ind. 434. Dodge v. Kinzy, 101 Ind. 102. Doherty v. Bell, 55 Ind. 205.. Domestic Sewing Mach. Co. v. Arthurhultz, 63 Ind. 322. Dow v. Norris, 4 N. H. 16. Dubois v. McLean,4 McLean,486.114 .393 18 Eastman v. State, 109 Ind. 278..564 Egberts v. Woods, 3 Paige, 516. .149 Egerton v. Egerton, 17 N. J. Eq. 419. Elder v. State, 96 Ind. 162. Electric, etc., Co. v. City, etc., of San Francisco, 9 R. W. Corp. Jour. 494.. Elkhart Car Works Co. v. Ellis, 92 69 564 113 Ind. 215.. 224 Elliott v. Salle, 14 Ohio St. 10. .121 Ellison v. Jackson, etc., Co., 12 Cal. 542. .249 Ellison v. Wisehart, 29 Ind. 32..250 Ely v. Board, etc., 112 Ind. 361.. 76 Emerson v. Senter, 118 U. S. 3. .149 Emerson v. Slater, 22 How. 28..247 Engler v. Acker, 106 Ind. 223. English v. Delaware, etc., Canal Co., 66 N. Y. 454.. Episcopal, etc., v. Appleton, 117 Mass. 326. Epperson v. Hostetter, 95 Ind. 22 352 43 583.. 84, 386 Epps v. State, 102 Ind. 539. .466 Erwin v. Garner, 108 Ind. 488...377 Evans v. Adams Ex. Co., 122 Ind. Evans v. State, ex rel., 58 Ind. 362. 587.. Evansville, etc., R R. Co. v. City of Evansville, 15 Ind. 395.. EvansviHe, etc., R. R. Co. v. Crist, 116 Ind 446.. Evansville, etc., R. R. Co. v. Hays, 118 Ind. 214.. Evansville, etc., R. R. Co. v. Nye, 113 Ind. 223. 141 398 308 463 234 .141 33 Eve v. Louis, 91 Ind. 457. 386 Everett 529 v. City of Council Bluffs, Everett v. City of Marquette, 53 46 Iowa, 66... Gage v. School District, 64 N. H. 232.. 47 Galveston, etc., Co. v. Hourein, 9 S. W. R. 661 249 Hadley v. Milligan, 100 Ind. 49.148 Hagadorn v. Stronach, etc., Co., 81 Mich. 56 Hagerty v. Arnold, 13 Kansas, 367 17 Haines v. Bottorff, 17 Ind. 348.. 57 Haldeman v. Bruckart, 45 Pa. St. 514. Hamilton v. Barricklow, 96 Ind. 398.. Hamm v. Romine, 98 Ind. 77. Hammock v. Barnes, 4 Bush, 390. 19 Hannon v. Hilliard, 101 Ind. 310. 57 Hannibal, etc. R. R. Co. v. Husen, 95 U. S. 465... 578, 590 Hardy v. McKinney, 107 Ind.364.313 Hargroves v. Thompson, 31 Miss. 211..... Harmon v. James, 7 Ind. 263. Harrell v. Kent, 71 Ind. 602. Harris v. Shaw, 13 Ill. 456.. 174 .515 .245 .224 46 249 .590 135 |