Opinions Per Curiam, Etc. 203 U. S. 198 U. S. 173; Clark v. Roller, 199 U. S. 541, 544. Mr. Myron A. Folsom for plaintiff in error. Mr. J. H. Forney for defendants in error. No. 360. W. W. ROSE, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. THE STATE OF KANSAS ON THE RELATION OF C. C. COLEMAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Kansas. Motions to dismiss or affirm submitted October 15, 1906. Decided October 22, 1906. Per Curiam. Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Smiley v. Kansas, 196 U. S. 447; Nonconnah Turnpike Company v. Tennessee, 131 U. S. App. Cl. VIII; Newport Light Company v. Newport, 151 U. S. 527; Harrison v. Morton, 171 U. S. 38. Mr. Frederic D. McKenney for plaintiff in error. Mr. C. C. Coleman for defendant in error. No. 208. FERDINAND EIDMAN, COLLECTOR, ETC., PETITIONER, v. FREDERICK B. TILGHMAN ET AL., EXECUTORS, ETC. On writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. Argued October 15, 1906. Decided October 29, 1906. Per Curiam. Judgment affirmed with costs by a divided court and cause remanded to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. The Attorney General, The Solicitor General and Mr. Assistant Attorney General Robb for petitioner. Mr. Edward B. Whitney for respondents. No. 6. THOMAS F. WILSON (ON BEHALF OF THE TERRITORY OF ARIZONA), APPELLANT, v. N. O. MURPHY ET AL. Appeal from the Supreme Court of the Territory of Arizona. Submitted October 11, 1906. Decided October 29, 1906. Per 203 U.S. Opinions Per Curiam, Etc. Curiam. Decree affirmed with costs. Mr. Eugene S. Ives for appellant. Mr. C. F. Ainsworth for appellees. No. 7. THOMAS F. WILSON (ON BEHALF OF THE TERRITORY OF ARIZONA), APPELLANT, v. GEORGE W. VICKERS ET AL. Appeal from the Supreme Court of the Territory of Arizona. Submitted October 11, 1906. Decided October 29, 1906. Per Curiam. Decree affirmed with costs. Mr. Eugene S. Ives for appellant. Mr. C. F. Ainsworth for appellees. No. 241. HAIGHT & FREESE COMPANY ET AL., PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, V. BEVERLY R. ROBINSON, RECEIVER, ETC. In error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. Motion to dismiss submitted October 22, 1906. Decided October 29, 1906. Per Curiam. Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Alexander v. United States, 201 U. S. 117, 122; Nelson v. United States, 201 U. S. 92; Hardee v. Wilson, 146 U. S. 179; Masterson v. Herndon, 10 Wall. 416; Beardsley v. Railway Company, 158 U. S. 123. Mr. Albert I. Sire for plaintiffs in error. Mr. Roger Foster for defendant in error. No. 62. FREDERICK H. VOGT, APPELLANT, v. MATILDA S. VOGT, BY HER GUARDIAN AD LITEM, PAULINE VOGT. Appeal from the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia. Argued for appellant October 25 and 26, 1906. The court declined to hear further argument. Decided October 29, 1906. Per Curiam. Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Schlosser v. Hemphill, 198 U. S. 173; California Consolidated Mining Company v. Manley, ante, p. 579, and cases cited. Mr. John Opinions Per Curiam, Etc. 203 U.S. C. Gittings for appellant. Mr. Leon Tobriner and Mr. J. J. Darlington for appellee. No. 36. HUGH P. STRONG ET AL., PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, v. BUFFALO LAND AND EXPLORATION COMPANY. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Minnesota. Submitted October 18, 1906. Decided October 29, 1906. Per Curiam. Judgment affirmed with costs on the authority of Midway Company v. Eaton, 183 U. S. 602. Mr. J. M. Vale, Mr. John Brennan, Mr. Moses E. Clapp and Mr. Newel H. Clapp for plaintiff in error. Mr. William C. White for defendant in error. Nos. 45 and 46. THE DAKOTA, WYOMING AND MISSOURI RIVER RAILROAD COMPANY ET AL., PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, v. CHARLES D. CROUCH ET AL., TRUSTEES. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of South Dakota. Argued for defendants in error and submitted for plaintiffs in error October 23, 1906. Decided October 29, 1906. Per Curiam. Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Hardee v. Wilson, 146 U. S. 179; Sipperley v. Smith, 155 U. S. 86; Mason v. United States, 136 U. S. 581; Grand Island &c. Railroad Company v. Sweeney, 103 Fed. Rep. 342; S. C., 95 Fed. Rep. 396; Sweeney v. Grand Island &c. Railroad Company, 61 Fed. Rep. 3; Eustis v. Bolles, 150 U. S. 361; Speed v. McCarthy, 181 U. S. 269; Pennsylvania Railroad Company v. Hughes, 191 U. S. 477; Telluride Power &c. Company v. Rio Grande &c. Railway Company, 175 U. S. 639; Telluride Power &c. Company v. Rio Grande &c. Railway Company, 187 U. S. 569; case below, 18 S. Dak. 540; 101 N. W. Rep. 722. Mr. Wm. T. Coad for plaintiffs in error. Mr. Frederick C. Bryan and Mr. Charles W. Brown for defendants in error. 203 U.S. Opinions Per Curiam, Etc. No. 68. W. S. KEEL, JR., ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. E. E. DOUVILLE. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of Mississippi. Argued October 29 and 30, 1906. Decided November 5, 1906. Per Curiam. Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction, on the authority of Cornel! v. Green, 163 U. S. 75, and cases cited. Mr. Wm. R. Harper, Mr. D. W. Harper and Mr. E. M. Barber for appellants. Mr. Walter J. Gex and Mr. E. J. Bowers for appellee. No. 392. J. G. RAWLINS, APPELLANT, v. J. F. PASSMORE, SHERIFF OF LOWNDES COUNTY, GA. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of Georgia. Argued for appellant and submitted for appellee October 29, 1906. Decided November 5, 1906. Per Curiam. Final order affirmed with costs. Rawlins v. Georgia, 201 U. S. 638; S. C., 52 S. E. Rep. 1; Craemer v. Washington, 168 U. S. 124, 128, 129. Mr. John Randolph Cooper for appellant. Mr. John C. Hart and Mr. W. E. Thomas for appellee. No. 93. KATIE MOESCHEN, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. THE TENEMENT HOUSE DEPARTMENT OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of New York. Argued November 9, 1906. Decided November 12, 1906. Per Curiam. Judgment affirmed with costs. Boston Beer Company v. Massachusetts, 97 U. S. 25, 32; Powell v. Pennsylvania, 127 U. S. 678; United States v. Des Moines &c. Company, 142 U. S. 510, 544; Holden v. Hardy, 169 U. S. 366; Atkin v. Kansas, 191 U. S. 207; Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 197 U. S. 11; Gardner v. Michigan, 199 U. S. 325; case below, 89 App. Div. 526; 179 N. Y. 325. And see Health Department v. Rector &c., 145 N. Y. 32; Harrington v. Board of Aldermen, Opinions Per Curiam, Etc. 203 U. S. 20 R. I. 233; Commonwealth v. Roberts, 155 Massachusetts, 281. Mr. Adolph Bloch for plaintiff in error. Mr. Theodore Connoly for defendant in error. No. 109. THE JAMES MCCREERY REALTY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, V. THE EQUITABLE NATIONAL BANK. In error to the City Court of the city of New York. Submitted November 16, 1906. Decided November 19, 1906. Per Curiam. Judgment affirmed with costs. Dower v. Richards, 151 U. S. 658; McCormick v. Market National Bank, 165 U. S. 538; California National Bank v. Kennedy, 167 U. S. 367. Mr. Eugene G. Kremer for plaintiff in error. Mr. Charles A. Hess for defendant in error. No. 110. DAVID LAMAR, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. ALBERT G. SPALDING. In error to the Court of Errors and Appeals of the State of New Jersey. Argued for defendant in error and submitted for plaintiff in error November 16, 1906. Decided November 19, 1906. Per Curiam. Judgment affirmed with costs. Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company v. Schmidt, 177 U. S. 230. Case below, 68 N. J. Eq. 686. Mr. Alan H. Strong and Mr. Harry Allen Mendelson for plaintiff in error. Mr. Edmund Wilson for defendant in error. No. 111. CARL S. REYNOLDS, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, V. THE STATE OF CONNECTICUT. In error to the Supreme Court of Errors of the State of Connecticut. Argued for plaintiff in error and submitted for defendant in error November 16, 1906. Decided November 19, 1906. Per Curiam. Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Schlosser v. Hemphill, |