The Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act of 1993: Hearing Before the Committee on Labor and Human Resources, United States Senate, One Hundred Third Congress, First Session, on S. 636 ... May 12, 1993, Volumen4U.S. Government Printing Office, 1993 - 202 páginas |
Otras ediciones - Ver todas
Términos y frases comunes
abortion clinic abortion providers abortion rights Access to Clinic action activists activities antiabortion violence arrested Arson assault Attorney General RENO bomb Bray CHAIRMAN City civil disobedience civil rights Clause clinic blockades Clinic Entrances Act committee Congress constitutional right criminal David Gunn defendants demonstration discrimination exercise expressive conduct Falls Church Federal law force or threat Freedom of Access harassment individual injunction injure interstate commerce intimidate or interfere issue Janet Reno language law enforcement legislation medical facility NATIONAL ABORTION FEDERATION officers Operation Rescue parens patriae patients peaceful penalties person physical obstruction picketing plaintiffs Planned Parenthood Police Department prevent pro-abortion pro-choice pro-life problem Professor Tribe prohibit protestors Providence Police Department providing abortion services punish Randall Terry reproductive health Rodriguez Section seeking Senator COATS Senator GREGG sidewalk counselor speech statute Supreme Court testimony threat of force tion U.S. Supreme Court United unlawful viewpoint violation Wichita women Women's Health
Pasajes populares
Página 146 - Thus we consider this case against the background of a profound national commitment to the principle that debate on public issues should be uninhibited, robust, and wide-open, and that it may well include vehement, caustic, and sometimes unpleasantly sharp attacks on government and public officials.
Página 36 - State action: (1) any inn, hotel, motel, or other establishment which provides lodging to transient guests, other than an establishment located within a building which contains not more than five rooms for rent or hire and which is actually occupied by the proprietor of such establishment as his residence...
Página 181 - ... a clear and present danger of a serious substantive evil that rises far above public inconvenience, annoyance, or unrest.
Página 37 - In the public interest and necessary to secure substantial justice, which function of certification may not be delegated. (2) Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to limit the authority of Federal officers, or a Federal grand jury, to Investigate possible violations of this section. (b) Whoever, whether or not acting under color of law, by force or threat of force willfully Injures, intimidates or interferes with, or attempts to injure, intimidate or Interfere with...
Página 98 - ... appropriate legislation" to enforce the Equal Protection Clause, that is, under the McCulloch v. Maryland standard, whether § 4 (e) may be regarded as an enactment to enforce the Equal Protection Clause, whether it is "plainly adapted to that end" and whether it is not prohibited by but is consistent with "the letter and spirit of the constitution.
Página 38 - ... injury results shall be fined not more than $10,000, or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results shall be subject to imprisonment for any term of years or for life.
Página 36 - Interfere with — (1) any person because he is or has been, or in order to intimidate such person or any other person or any class of persons from — (A...
Página 15 - ... the purpose of preventing or hindering the constituted authorities of any State from giving or securing to all persons within such State the equal protection of the laws...
Página 36 - ... (B) affording another person or class of persons opportunity or protection to so participate ; or (5) any citizen because he is or has been, or in order to intimidate such citizen or any other citizen from lawfully aiding or encouraging other persons to participate, without discrimination on account of race, color, religion or national origin...
Página 18 - This Court has held that when "speech" and "nonspeech" elements are combined in the same course of conduct, a sufficiently important governmental interest in regulating the nonspeech element can justify incidental limitations on First Amendment freedoms.